Human papillomavirus vaccine beliefs and practice characteristics in rural and urban adolescent care providers
Authors:
- Cody L. GoesslCGCody L. Goessl
- Ben ChristiansonBCBen Christianson
- Kayla E. HansonKHKayla E. Hanson
- Elizabeth J. PolterEPElizabeth J. Polter
- Scott C. OlsonSOScott C. Olson
- Thomas G. BoyceTBThomas G. Boyce
- Denise DunnDDDenise Dunn
- Charnetta L. WilliamsCWCharnetta L. Williams
- Edward A. BelongiaEBEdward A. Belongia
- Huong Q. McLeanHMHuong Q. McLean
- Jeffrey J. VanWormerJVJeffrey J. VanWormer
Open Access
- 9 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Public Health
- Vol. 22 (1) , 1-8
Abstract
Background: The human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine is recommended for all adolescents age 11–12 years. HPV vaccine coverage remains suboptimal in the United States though, particularly in rural areas. We surveyed adolescent immunization providers in two Midwestern states to assess rural vs. urban differences in HPV vaccine resources, practices, and attitudes. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was sent to all licensed adolescent care providers in a subset of urban and rural counties in Minnesota and Wisconsin during 2019. Multivariable regression was used to identify attitudes and practices that differentiated rural vs. urban providers. Results: There were 437 survey respondents (31% rural). Significantly fewer rural providers had evening/weekend adolescent vaccination appointments available (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.21 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.12, 0.36]), had prior experience with adolescent vaccine quality improvement projects (aOR = 0.52 [95% CI: 0.28, 0.98]), and routinely recommended HPV vaccine during urgent/acute care visits (aOR = 0.37 [95% CI: 0.18, 0.79]). Significantly more rural providers had standing orders to administer all recommended adolescent vaccines (aOR = 2.81 [95% CI: 1.61, 4.91]) and reported giving HPV vaccine information to their patients/families before it is due (aOR = 3.10 [95% CI: 1.68, 5.71]). Conclusions: Rural vs. urban differences in provider practices were mixed in that rural providers do not implement some practices that may promote HPV vaccination, but do implement other practices that promote HPV vaccination. It remains unclear how the observed differences would affect HPV vaccine attitudes or adolescent vaccination decisions for parents in rural areas.Keywords
Funding Information
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093, 5U01 IP001093)
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Association between parent attitudes and receipt of human papillomavirus vaccine in adolescentsBMC Public Health, 2017
- Disparities in Provider Recommendation of Human Papillomavirus Vaccination for U.S. AdolescentsJournal of Adolescent Health, 2016
- HPV vaccination: Population approaches for improving ratesHuman Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics, 2016
- Vaccination Rates among Adolescents in Minnesota as Compared with the United States: Not "Above Average".2016
- Catching Up With the HPV Vaccine: Challenges and Opportunities in Primary CareThe Annals of Family Medicine, 2015
- Community Health Centers Employ Diverse Staffing Patterns, Which Can Provide Productivity Lessons For Medical PracticesHealth Affairs, 2015
- Barriers to Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Among US AdolescentsJAMA Pediatrics, 2014
- Missed clinical opportunities: Provider recommendations for HPV vaccination for 11–12 year old girls are limitedVaccine, 2011
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics supportJournal of Biomedical Informatics, 2009
- Improving adolescent health: Focus on HPV vaccine acceptanceJournal of Adolescent Health, 2005