A Comprehensive Methodology for Evaluating the Economic Impacts of Floods: An Application to Canada, Mexico, and the United States
Authors:
- Xin WenXWXin Wen
- Ana María Alarcón FerreiraAFAna María Alarcón Ferreira
- Lynn M. RaeLRLynn M. Rae
- Hirmand SaffariHSHirmand Saffari
- Zafar AdeelZAZafar Adeel
- Laura A. BakkensenLBLaura A. Bakkensen
- Karla M. Méndez EstradaKEKarla M. Méndez Estrada
- Gregg M. GarfinGGGregg M. Garfin
- Renee A. McPhersonRMRenee A. McPherson
- Ernesto Franco VargasEVErnesto Franco Vargas
Open Access
- 29 October 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Sustainability
- Vol. 14 (21) , 14139
Abstract
In 2020, we developed a comprehensive methodology (henceforth, the methodology) to assess flood-related economic costs. The methodology covers direct damages, indirect effects, and losses and additional costs across 105 social, infrastructure, economic, and emergency response indicators. As a companion paper, this study presents findings from analysis of applying the methodology to investigate economic costs for major flood events between 2013 and 2017 and to assess gaps in the existing datasets across Canada, Mexico, and the United States. In addition, we conducted one case study from each country for an in-depth examination of the applicability of the methodology. Applying the methodology, Mexico showed the most complete flood indicator data availability and accessibility among the three countries. We found that most flood-related economic cost assessments evaluated only direct damages, and indirect effect data were rarely included in datasets in the three countries. Moreover, few of the records from Canada and the United States captured the losses and additional costs. Flood-related economic cost data at the municipal or county level were easily accessible in Mexico and the United States. Mexico’s National Center for Prevention of Disasters (Centro Nacional de Prevención de Desastres), unique among the three nations, provided access to centralized and comprehensive flood cost data. In the United States and Canada, data collection by multiple agencies that focus on different jurisdictions and scales of flood damage complicated comprehensive data collection and led to incomplete economic cost assessments. Our analysis strongly suggests that countries should aim to expand the set of data indicators available and become more granular across space and time while maintaining data quality. This study provides significant insights about approaches for collating spatial, temporal, and outcome-specific localized flood economic costs and the major data gaps across the three countries.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Commission for Environmental Cooperation
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Climate-driven variability in the occurrence of major floods across North America and EuropeJournal of Hydrology, 2017
- A global framework for future costs and benefits of river-flood protection in urban areasNature Climate Change, 2017
- Rapid attribution of the August 2016 flood-inducing extreme precipitation in south Louisiana to climate changeHydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2017
- Using climate change scenarios to evaluate future effectiveness of potential wetlands in mitigating high flows in a Midwestern U.S. watershedEcological Engineering, 2016
- Assessing direct and indirect economic impacts of a flood event through the integration of spatial and computable general equilibrium modellingEnvironmental Modelling & Software, 2015
- Flood Insurance in Canada: Implications for Flood Management and Residential Vulnerability to Flood HazardsEnvironmental Management, 2014
- Climate change and river floods in the European Union: Socio-economic consequences and the costs and benefits of adaptationGlobal Environmental Change, 2013
- Global flood risk under climate changeNature Climate Change, 2013
- Secondary Data Analysis: An Important Tool for Addressing Developmental QuestionsJournal of Cognition and Development, 2012
- When Do Losses Count?Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2009