Clinical inertia in the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care
Authors:
- Manel Mata-CasesManel Mata-Cases
- Josep Franch-NadalJFJosep Franch-Nadal
- Josep Maria Pepió-VilaubíJPJosep Maria Pepió-Vilaubí
- Gabriel Coll-De-TueroGCGabriel Coll-De-Tuero
- on behalf of the GEDAPS (Primary Care Group for the study of Diabetes) of the Catalonian Society of Family and Community MedicineOMon behalf of the GEDAPS (Primary Care Group for the study of Diabetes) of the Catalonian Society of Family and Community Medicine
- 27 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Current Medical Research and Opinion
- Vol. 29 (11) , 1495-1502
Abstract
To assess clinical inertia, defined as failure to intensify antidiabetic treatment of patients who have not achieved the HbA1c therapeutic goal (≤7%). Multicenter cross-sectional study. Clinical inertia was assessed in a random sample of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients seen in primary care centers. A total of 2783 patients (51.3% males; mean age: 68 [±11.5] years; diabetes duration: 7.1 [±5.6] years; mean HbA1c: 6.8 [±1.5]) were analyzed. Of those, 997 (35.8%) had HbA1c >7%. Treatment was intensified in 66.8% and consisted of: dose increase (40.5%); addition of oral antidiabetic (45.8%); or insulin treatment initiation (3.7%). Mean HbA1c values in patients for whom treatment was intensified vs. non-intensified were 8.4% (±1.2) vs. 8.2% (±1.2), p < 0.05. Clinical inertia was detected in 33.2% of patients and diminished along with treatment complexity: lifestyle changes only (38.8%), oral monotherapy (40.3%), combined oral antidiabetics (34.5%), insulin monotherapy (26.1%) and combination of insulin and oral antidiabetics (21.4%). Clinical inertia decreased as HbA1c increased: 37.3% for HbA1c values ranging between 7.1%–8%; 29.4% for the 8.1%–9% HbA1c range and 27.1% for HbA1c ≥9%. Multivariate analysis confirmed that diabetes duration, step of treatment and HbA1c were related to inertia. For each unit of HbA1c increase clinical inertia decreased 47% (OR: 0.53). The retrospective design of the study precluded an accurate investigation about reasons for lack of intensification that could actually be justified by some patient conditions, especially patients’ lack of adherence. Clinical inertia affected one third of T2DM patients with poor glycemic control and was greater in patients treated with only lifestyle changes or oral monotherapy. Treatment changes were performed when mean HbA1c values were 1.4 points above therapeutic goals.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Control of Glycemia and Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes in Primary Care in Catalonia (Spain)Diabetes Care, 2012
- Evaluation of a Diabetes Management System Based on Practice Guidelines, Integrated Care, and Continuous Quality Management in a Federal State of GermanyDiabetes Care, 2008
- Five-Year Impact of a Continuous Quality Improvement Effort Implemented by a Network of Diabetes Outpatient ClinicsDiabetes Care, 2008
- Control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care. The gap between guidelines and reality in SpainInternational Journal Of Clinical Practice, 2007
- Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2007Diabetes Care, 2007
- Improvements in Diabetes Processes of Care and Intermediate Outcomes: United States, 1988–2002Annals of Internal Medicine, 2006
- Trends in Care Practices and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries with DiabetesAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2005
- Diabetes and the quality and outcomes frameworkBMJ, 2005
- Perfil de los pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2, en la Atención Primaria españolaRevista Clínica Española, 2004
- Evaluation of risk factors for development of complications in Type II diabetes in EuropeDiabetologia, 2002