Objective performance indicators during robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass distinguish experienced from trainee surgeons: a cross-sectional study
Authors:
Open Access
- 14 July 2025
- journal article
- 2024 sages-oral
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 39 (8) , 5178-5188
Abstract
Introduction: Objective performance indicators (OPIs) obtained during robotic surgery have been associated with surgeons’ experience and may influence patient outcomes. However, their evaluation in bariatric surgery has received little attention. The study aimed to evaluate whether OPIs can effectively distinguish experienced surgeons from trainees during robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (r-RYGB). Methods: Kinematic and event data were recorded during r-RYGB operations (n = 31; 2 experienced attending surgeons, 6 trainees) utilizing the da Vinci Surgical System’s data recorder between August 2021 and December 2022. De-identified data were extracted, videos annotated within eight surgical steps, and OPI generated and analyzed. OPIs generated included console active time, instrument movement speed (path length/console active time), bimanual dexterity (ratio of dominant to non-dominant instrument path length), and workspace volume rate. Results: Significant OPI differences were noted in 3 out of 8 steps of the procedure. During the dissection phase, attending surgeons exhibited greater right-hand controller usage (bimanual dexterity, p = 0.018), and faster non-dominant instrument path length speed (p = 0.002). During the creation of the gastric pouch, experts displayed similar higher bimanual dexterity (p = 0.001), but slower non-dominant instrument path length speed (p = 0.012). Trainees had a lower active console time than attending surgeons during gastric pouch creation (p = 0.03) and hand-sewn anastomosis (p = 0.005). Both cohorts demonstrated similar OPIs during other steps such as mesenteric division, mesenteric closure, common channel enterotomy closure, limb measurement, and stapled anastomosis. Conclusion: Step-specific OPIs obtained during robotic surgery can effectively distinguish between experienced and trainee surgeons. With further validation, OPIs may provide an objective assessment of trainee performance and aid in training and autonomy decisions.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of targeted educational resources to improve robotic bariatric surgery trainingSurgical Endoscopy, 2023
- A multifactorial evaluation of objective performance indicators and video analysis in the context of case complexity and clinical outcomes in robotic-assisted cholecystectomySurgical Endoscopy, 2023
- Kinematic data profile and clinical outcomes in robotic inguinal hernia repairs: a pilot studySurgical Endoscopy, 2023
- Objective assessment of robotic surgical skills: review of literature and future directionsSurgical Endoscopy, 2022
- Review of automated performance metrics to assess surgical technical skills in robot-assisted laparoscopySurgical Endoscopy, 2021
- Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year AnalysisObesity Surgery, 2020
- Using objective robotic automated performance metrics and task-evoked pupillary response to distinguish surgeon expertiseWorld Journal of Urology, 2019
- Automated Performance Metrics and Machine Learning Algorithms to Measure Surgeon Performance and Anticipate Clinical Outcomes in Robotic SurgeryJAMA Surgery, 2018
- Viewpoint matters: objective performance metrics for surgeon endoscope control during robot-assisted surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2016
- Robotic surgery training: construct validity of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS)Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2016