Health care professionals’ views of the factors influencing the decision to refer patients to a stroke rehabilitation trial
Open Access
- 18 December 2015
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Trials
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Effective recruitment is an essential element of successful research but notoriously difficult to achieve. This article examines health care professionals’ views on the factors influencing decision-making regarding referral to a stroke rehabilitation trial. Semi-structured interviews and a card-sorting task were undertaken with stroke service staff in acute and community hospital trusts. Data analysis used a thematic framework approach. Twenty-seven qualified health care professionals from 12 (6 acute and 6 community) hospital trusts and one charity participated. Four main factors emerged: patient-related, professional views, the organisation and research logistics, which all contributed to staff’s decision about whether to refer patients to a trial. Clinicians identified patient-related factors as the most frequent influence and considered themselves the patients’ advocate. They used their knowledge of the patient to anticipate the patients’ reaction to possible participation and tended to only refer those whom they perceived would respond positively. Participants also identified experience of research, a sense of ownership of the project and a positive view of the intervention being evaluated as factors influencing referral. The need to prioritise clinical matters, meet managerial demands and cope with constant change were organisational factors impacting negatively on referral. Staff often simply forgot about recruitment in the face of other higher priorities. Quick, simple, flexible research processes that were closely aligned with existing ways of working were felt to facilitate recruitment. Patient- and professional-related factors were the most frequent influence on clinicians’ recruitment decisions, which often had a ‘gate-keeping’ effect. Managerial and clinical responsibility to juggle multiple (often higher) priorities was also an important factor. To facilitate recruitment, researchers need to develop strategies to approach potential participants as directly as possible to enable them to make their own decisions about participation; ensure that research processes are as quick and simple as possible; align with existing clinical pathways and systems; and give regular reminders and ongoing support to promote recruitment. ISRCTN, 98287938 . Registered 6 May 2015Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agenciesTrials, 2013
- Barriers to recruitment for surgical trials in head and neck oncology: a survey of trial investigatorsBMJ Open, 2013
- Methods to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysisBMJ Open, 2013
- Reflecting on the methodological challenges of recruiting to a United Kingdom-wide, multi-centre, randomised controlled trial in gynaecology outpatient settingsTrials, 2013
- Improving the recruitment activity of clinicians in randomised controlled trials: a systematic reviewBMJ Open, 2012
- Successful recruitment to trials: a phased approach to opening gates and building bridgesBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2011
- Key issues in recruitment to randomised controlled trials with very different interventions: a qualitative investigation of recruitment to the SPARE trial (CRUK/07/011)Trials, 2011
- Strategies for Increasing Recruitment to Randomised Controlled Trials: Systematic ReviewPLOS Medicine, 2010
- Quality improvement report Improving design and conduct of randomised trials by embedding them in qualitative research: ProtecT (prostate testing for cancer and treatment) study Commentary: presenting unbiased information to patients can be difficultBMJ, 2002
- Equipoise and the Ethics of Clinical ResearchNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987