Outcomes of Hepatectomy for Hepatolithiasis Based on 3-Dimensional Reconstruction Technique
Authors:
- Chi-Hua FangCFChi-Hua Fang
- Jun LiuJLJun Liu
- Ying-Fang FanYFYing-Fang Fan
- Jian YangJYJian Yang
- Nan XiangNXNan Xiang
- Ning ZengNZNing Zeng
- 1 August 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 217 (2) , 280-288
Abstract
The aim of our study was to evaluate the perioperative and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technique for hepatolithiasis by comparing it with traditional hepatectomy. From December 2005 to September 2012, 56 consecutive patients underwent hepatectomy based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technique for hepatolithiasis in our hospital (group A). During the same period, 42 patients with hepatolithiasis who met the inclusion criteria for hepatectomy were selected for traditional hepatectomy (group B). All operations were performed by the authors. There was no significant difference in preoperative data between the 2 groups statistically. Compared with patients in group B, those in group A had a significantly lower stone residual rate (intermediate rate, 3.6% vs 19.0%; final rate, 0% vs 9.5%) and stone recurrence rate (3.6% vs 23.8%), a lower intrahepatic duct stricture residual rate (1.8% vs 14.3%), and a faster operating time (218.8 ± 55.5 minutes vs 254.7 ± 65.6 minutes). Intraoperative blood transfusion, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, and recurrent cholangitis rate were similar. No significant dominance was found in group A with respect to serum aminotransferase level, serum bilirubin level, serum albumin level, and prothrombin time. There was a significant dominance in group A for serum hemoglobin level (116.3 ± 16.0 g/L vs 108.0 ± 13.9 g/L; p < 0.05). Twenty-two complications occurred, 10 in group A and 12 in group B. Neither group had any perioperative mortality. Hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis based on 3-dimensional reconstruction technique is feasible and safe in selected patients. Compared with traditional hepatectomy, it is more effective for diagnosis and treatment of hepatolithiasis.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Hepatolithiasis and the Syndrome of Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis: Clinical, Radiologic, and Pathologic FeaturesSeminars in Liver Disease, 2011
- Laparoscopic hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis: a feasibility and safety study in 29 patientsSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Laparoscopy versus open left lateral segmentectomy for recurrent pyogenic cholangitisSurgical Endoscopy, 2005
- Laparoscopic treatment of recurrent pyogenic cholangitisJournal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, 2005
- Reappraisal of percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic lithotomy for primary hepatolithiasisSurgical Endoscopy, 2005
- Immediate and long-term outcomes of hepatectomy for hepatolithiasisSurgery, 2004
- Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis: hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy11No competing interests declared.Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 1999
- Relative prevalence of gallstone diseases in TaiwanDigestive Diseases and Sciences, 1992
- Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in hepatolithiasis: A frequently overlooked diseaseJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1991
- The surgical management of primary intrahepatic stonesBritish Journal of Surgery, 1982