When Lack of Trust in the Government and in Scientists Reinforces Social Inequalities in Vaccination Against COVID-19
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 July 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Public Health
- Vol. 10, 908152
Abstract
Objective: To assess whether lack of trust in the government and scientists reinforces social and racial inequalities in vaccination practices.Design: A follow-up of the EpiCov random population-based cohort survey.Setting: In July 2021, in France.Participants: Eighty-thousand nine hundred and seventy-one participants aged 18 years and more.Main Outcome Measures: Adjusted odds ratios of COVID-19 vaccination status (received at least one dose/ intends to get vaccinated/ does not know whether to get vaccinated/refuses vaccination) were assessed using multinomial regressions to test associations with social and trust factors and to study how these two factors interacted with each other.Results: In all, 72.2% were vaccinated at the time of the survey. The population of unvaccinated people was younger, less educated, had lower incomes, and more often belonged to racially minoritized groups, as compared to vaccinated people. Lack of trust in the government and scientists to curb the spread of the epidemic were the factors most associated with refusing to be vaccinated: OR = 8.86 (7.13 to 11.00) for the government and OR = 9.07 (7.71 to 10.07) for scientists, compared to vaccinated people. Lack of trust was more prevalent among the poorest which consequently reinforced social inequalities in vaccination. The poorest 10% who did not trust the government reached an OR of 16.2 (11.9 to 22.0) for refusing to be vaccinated compared to the richest 10% who did.Conclusion: There is a need to develop depoliticised outreach programmes targeted at the most socially disadvantaged groups, and to design vaccination strategies conceived with people from different social and racial backgrounds to enable them to make fully informed choices.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- European Research Council
- Horizon 2020
This publication has 53 references indexed in Scilit:
- Handbook on Political Trust2017
- Women and Health: Women's Dual Roles as Both Recipients and Providers of HealthcareJournal of Women's Health, 2016
- Self-Reported Experiences of Discrimination and Health: Scientific Advances, Ongoing Controversies, and Emerging IssuesAnnual Review of Clinical Psychology, 2015
- Reconsidering inequalities in preventive health care: an application of cultural health capital theory and the life‐course perspective to the take‐up of mammography screeningSociology of Health & Illness, 2014
- Untangling the associations among distrust, race, and neighborhood social environment: A social disorganization perspectiveSocial Science & Medicine, 2012
- Does political trust matter? An empirical investigation into the relation between political trust and support for law complianceEuropean Journal of Political Research, 2011
- Social Environment and Physical activity: A review of concepts and evidenceSocial Science & Medicine, 2006
- Race and trust in the health care systemPublic Health Reports®, 2003
- Race and Trust in the Health Care SystemPublic Health Reports®, 2003
- Political Trust and TrustworthinessAnnual Review of Political Science, 2000