The protective effect of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in Scottish healthcare workers
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 April 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by European Respiratory Society (ERS) in ERJ Open Research
- Vol. 7 (2)
Abstract
Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are believed to be at increased risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. It is not known to what extent the natural production of antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 is protective against re-infection.Methods: A prospective observational study of HCWs in Scotland (UK) from May to September 2020 was performed. The Siemens SARS-CoV-2 total antibody assay was used to establish seroprevalence in this cohort. Controls, matched for age and sex to the general local population, were studied for comparison. New infections (up to 2 December 2020) post antibody testing were recorded to determine whether the presence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies protects against re-infection.Results: A total of 2063 health and social care workers were recruited for this study. At enrolment, 300 HCWs had a positive antibody test (14.5%). 11 out of 231 control sera tested positive (4.8%). HCWs therefore had an increased likelihood of a positive test (OR 3.4, 95% CI 1.85–6.16; p<0.0001). Dentists were most likely to test positive. 97.3% of patients who had previously tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 by reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR had positive antibodies. 18.7% had an asymptomatic infection. There were 38 new infections with SARS-CoV-2 in HCWs who were previously antibody negative, and one symptomatic RT-PCR-positive re-infection. The presence of antibodies was therefore associated with an 85% reduced risk of re-infection with SARS-CoV-2 (hazard ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.06–0.35; p=0.026).Conclusion: HCWs were three times more likely to test positive for SARS-CoV-2 than the general population. Almost all infected individuals developed an antibody response, which was 85% effective in protecting against re-infection with SARS-CoV-2.Keywords
All Related Versions
Funding Information
- NHS Tayside COVID-19 Research Grant
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Serology testing in the COVID-19 pandemic responseThe Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020
- False Negative Tests for SARS-CoV-2 Infection — Challenges and ImplicationsNew England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Differential occupational risks to healthcare workers from SARS-CoV-2: A prospective observational studymedRxiv, 2020
- Greater risk of severe COVID-19 in Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic populations is not explained by cardiometabolic, socioeconomic or behavioural factors, or by 25(OH)-vitamin D status: study of 1326 cases from the UK BiobankJournal of Public Health, 2020
- SARS-CoV-2 virus and antibodies in front-line Health Care Workers in an acute hospital in London: preliminary results from a longitudinal studymedRxiv, 2020
- SARS, MERS and COVID-19 among healthcare workers: A narrative reviewJournal of Infection and Public Health, 2020
- Asymptomatic Transmission, the Achilles’ Heel of Current Strategies to Control Covid-19New England Journal of Medicine, 2020
- Evaluating the national PPE guidance for NHS healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemicClinical Medicine, 2020
- Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in ItalyJAMA, 2020
- Dentistry and coronavirus (COVID-19) - moral decision-makingBritish Dental Journal, 2020