Increased expression of Polδ does not alter the canonical replication program in vivo
Authors:
Open Access
- 26 February 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by F1000 Research Ltd in Wellcome Open Research
- Vol. 6, 44
Abstract
Background: In vitro experiments utilising the reconstituted Saccharomyces cerevisiae eukaryotic replisome indicated that the efficiency of the leading strand replication is impaired by a moderate increase in Polδ concentration. It was hypothesised that the slower rate of the leading strand synthesis characteristic for reactions containing two-fold and four-fold increased concentration of Polδ represented a consequence of a relatively rare event, during which Polδ stochastically outcompeted Polε and, in an inefficient manner, temporarily facilitated extension of the leading strand. Inspired by this observation, we aimed to determine whether similarly increased Polδ levels influence replication dynamics in vivo using the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe as a model system. Methods: To generate S. pombe strains over-expressing Polδ, we utilised Cre-Lox mediated cassette exchange and integrated one or three extra genomic copies of all four Polδ genes. To estimate expression of respective Polδ genes in Polδ-overexpressing mutants, we measured relative transcript levels of cdc1+ , cdc6+ (or cdc6L591G ), cdc27+ and cdm1+ by reverse transcription followed by quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR). To assess the impact of Polδ over-expression on cell physiology and replication dynamics, we used standard cell biology techniques and polymerase usage sequencing. Results: We provide an evidence that two-fold and four-fold over-production of Polδ does not significantly alter growth rate, cellular morphology and S-phase duration. Polymerase usage sequencing analysis further indicates that increased Polδ expression does not change activities of Polδ, Polε and Polα at replication initiation sites and across replication termination zones. Additionally, we show that mutants over-expressing Polδ preserve WT-like distribution of replication origin efficiencies. Conclusions: Our experiments do not disprove the existence of opportunistic polymerase switches; however, the data indicate that, if stochastic replacement of Polε for Polδ does occur in vivo, it represents a rare phenomenon that does not significantly influence canonical replication program.Keywords
Funding Information
- Wellcome Trust (110047)
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Polymerase δ replicates both strands after homologous recombination–dependent fork restartNature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2015
- A global profile of replicative polymerase usageNature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2015
- Tracking replication enzymology in vivo by genome-wide mapping of ribonucleotide incorporationNature Structural & Molecular Biology, 2015
- Optimization of the analogue-sensitive Cdc2/Cdk1 mutant byin vivoselection eliminates physiological limitations to its use in cell cycle analysisOpen Biology, 2014
- Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2Nature Methods, 2012
- The Major Roles of DNA Polymerases Epsilon and Delta at the Eukaryotic Replication Fork Are Evolutionarily ConservedPLOS Genetics, 2011
- Gene tagging and gene replacement using recombinase-mediated cassette exchange in Schizosaccharomyces pombeGene, 2008
- Schizosaccharomyces pombe Cells Lacking the Amino-Terminal Catalytic Domains of DNA Polymerase Epsilon Are Viable but Require the DNA Damage Checkpoint ControlMolecular and Cellular Biology, 2001
- DNA Polymerase ε Catalytic Domains Are Dispensable for DNA Replication, DNA Repair, and Cell ViabilityMolecular Cell, 1999
- Cdm1, the smallest subunit of DNA polymerase d in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe, is non-essential for growth and divisionCurrent Genetics, 1998