Effectiveness of At-Risk Gamblers’ Temporary Self-Exclusion from Internet Gambling Sites
Authors:
- 4 July 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of Gambling Studies
- Vol. 35 (2) , 601-615
Abstract
To prevent risks associated with online gambling, many jurisdictions propose self-exclusion strategies as a part of a responsible gambling policy. To protect online gamblers, French law provides for a 7-day temporary non-reducible and voluntary self-exclusion measure that applies only to select websites. The objective of our study was to evaluate the effectiveness of this self-exclusion measure for at-risk online gamblers. It was an experimental randomized controlled trial targeted at risk prevention. The main outcomes were the money wagered and time spent gambling assessed 15 days (short-term) and 2 months (medium-term) after the implementation of the self-exclusion measure. The effectiveness of self-exclusion was also compared according to the gambling type (pure chance games, such as lottery or scratch tickets, skill and chance bank games such as sports betting or horserace betting, and skill and chance games such as poker). Sixty participants were randomly assigned to the experimental condition (n = 30; with the implementation of a self-exclusion measure) or control condition (n = 30). The randomization was stratified according to their favorite game [pure chance games (n = 20), skill and chance bank games (n = 20), and skill and chance social games (n = 20)]. The results revealed that self-exclusion had no short-term impact—but did have a medium-term impact—on gambling habits. After 2 months, the gambling-related cognitions (“illusion of control” and “the perceived inability to stop gambling”) and the subscale “desire” of the Gambling Craving Scale (GACS) have decreased. Participants’ opinions about the impact and effectiveness of self-exclusion were discussed. To conclude, it appeared that temporary self-exclusion is an interesting tool to protect online gamblers from excessive practices, but several modifications have to be made to improve its effectiveness and use.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministère des Affaires Sociales et de la Santé (PHRC 2012 12-020-0177)
- Institut National de Prévention et d'Éducation pour la Santé (FR) (INPES 2012 053/12-DAS)
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Interactions Between Risk and Protective Factors on Problem Gambling in AsiaJournal of Gambling Studies, 2014
- Impulsive sensation seeking and gambling practice among a sample of online poker players: Comparison between non pathological, problem and pathological gamblersPersonality and Individual Differences, 2013
- Problem gambling in poker: money, rationality and control in a skill-based social gameInternational Gambling Studies, 2010
- Internet Self-Exclusion: Characteristics of Self-Excluded Gamblers and Preliminary Evidence for Its EffectivenessInternational Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 2010
- The Gambling Craving Scale: Psychometric validation and behavioral outcomes.Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 2009
- Self-exclusion: A Proposed Gateway to Treatment ModelInternational Gambling Studies, 2007
- The Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS): development, confirmatory factor validation and psychometric propertiesAddiction, 2004
- Casino self‐exclusion programmes: A review of the issues1International Gambling Studies, 2002
- The theory of planned behaviorOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1991
- Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.Psychological Review, 1977