Evaluating the Quality of Argumentation: The Role of Epistemic Ideals and Reliable Processes
Top Cited Papers
- 9 May 2025
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Cognition and Instruction
- Vol. 43 (3) , 201-232
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 107 references indexed in Scilit:
- Engineering for sustainable communities: Epistemic tools in support of equitable and consequential middle school engineeringScience Education, 2019
- Examining Classroom Science Practice Communities: How Teachers and Students Negotiate Epistemic Agency and Learn Science‐as‐PracticeScience Education, 2014
- Improvements to elementary children's epistemic understanding from sustained argumentationScience Education, 2012
- A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contextsScience Education, 2010
- Making sense of argumentation and explanationScience Education, 2008
- Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science educationScience Education, 2008
- Assessment of the ways students generate arguments in science education: Current perspectives and recommendations for future directionsScience Education, 2008
- TAPping into argumentation: Developments in the application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for studying science discourseScience Education, 2004
- ?Doing the lesson? or ?doing science?: Argument in high school geneticsScience Education, 2000
- Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroomsScience Education, 2000