Selection Bias in Linear Regression, Logit and Probit Models
Authors:
- 1 November 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Sociological Methods & Research
- Vol. 18 (2-3) , 360-390
Abstract
Missing data are common in observational studies due to self-selection of subjects. Missing data can bias estimates of linear regression and related models. The nature of selection bias and econometric methods for correcting it are described. The econometric approach relies upon a specification of the selection mechanism. We extend this approach to binary logit and probit models and provide a simple test for selection bias in these models. An analysis of candidate preference in the 1984 U.S. presidential election illustrates the technique.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Residential Mobility and Voter TurnoutAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- Least absolute deviations estimation for the censored regression modelJournal of Econometrics, 1984
- An Econometric Analysis of Residential Electric Appliance Holdings and ConsumptionEconometrica, 1984
- Tobit models: A surveyJournal of Econometrics, 1984
- Distribution-Free Maximum Likelihood Estimator of the Binary Choice ModelEconometrica, 1983
- Sample Selection Bias as a Specification ErrorEconometrica, 1979
- Shadow Prices, Market Wages, and Labor SupplyEconometrica, 1974
- Regression Analysis When the Dependent Variable is Truncated Lognormal, with an Application to the Determinants of the Duration of Welfare DependencyInternational Economic Review, 1974
- Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent VariablesEconometrica, 1958
- Specification Bias in Estimates of Production FunctionsJournal of Farm Economics, 1957