Vibration-Based Machine Learning Model Training for Railway Bridge Health Monitoring

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Bridge health monitoring and machine learning are increasingly intertwined for civil engineers and artificial intelligence experts. Bridges’ poor health can result in severe outcomes if not addressed in time. Therefore, continuous monitoring is required to detect any anomaly or damage. Sensors, such as accelerometers, inclinometers, thermistors, etc., can help actively monitor these bridges. The signals from these sensors help record physiological activities. Such activities are helpful for anomaly detection, damage localization, and bridge health predictions with the help of machine learning algorithms. The proposed method extracts features from the dynamic response of a bridge to ambient excitation. It focuses on processing the signal received from different accelerometers installed on a steel railway bridge to determine the location of the damage and the level of the damage predictions. Initially, features are extracted from time-series data; then, they are fed to a deep neural network after some pre-processing. Normal and augmented data are used with different parameter tuning for results. Original data is also subdivided, and the effect of data slicing on the predictions is investigated. The results show that one-fourth of the slicing of the original data gives the best results for training and testing accuracy with a deep neural network. The results show that the reduced matrix representation, particularly the 40 × 40 feature slicing, improved the classification performance for the predefined bridge scenario classes under the considered experimental settings. For bridge scenario classification, the best reported accuracy was 93.54%, while for damage intensity classification the best reported accuracy was 98.21%. In the DNN-based optimizer comparison, the Adam optimizer achieved higher and more stable performance than Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD), with test accuracies of 92.3% and 93.7% compared with 75.2% and 86.4%, respectively. It is also observed that the Adam optimizer outperformed Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) in terms of both damage localization and damage intensity estimation.
Funding Information
  • Italian Ministry of University and Research (MUR) National Innovation Ecosystem (ECS00000041–VITALITY–CUP E13C22001060006)

This publication has 43 references indexed in Scilit: