Redefining Centrality Measures in Weighted Causal Graphs
Open Access
- 29 May 2026
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Mathematics
- Vol. 14 (11) , 1887
Abstract
Causal graphs are powerful instruments for structuring information and analyzing the extent to which an observed effect can be attributed to a given cause. In this work, we demonstrate how edge-weighted causal graphs can be used to quantify whether a sentence acts as a direct or indirect cause. We introduce methods to identify the causal path with the highest total strength between two concepts and, given a specific context, to determine the pair of concepts with the strongest causal connection. In addition, we propose centrality measures that incorporate causality scores and graph weights, enabling the ranking of sentences by causal importance and identifying the most relevant ones.Keywords
Funding Information
- Universidad Pontificia Comillas (12345678)
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Summarizing information by means of causal sentences through causal graphsJournal of Applied Logic, 2017
- Extracting answers from causal mechanisms in a medical documentNeurocomputing, 2014
- Extraction, analysis and representation of imperfect conditional and causal sentences by means of a semi-automatic process2010
- Extraction of Conditional and Causal Sentences from Queries to Provide a Flexible AnswerLecture Notes in Computer Science, 2009
- Causation, Prediction, and Search2001
- Fuzzy cognitive mapsInternational Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 1986
- Knowledge and Error1976
- The Canon of Pure Reason1929
- System of logic, ratiocinative and inductive, being a connected view of the principles of evidence and the methods of scientific investigation (Vol 2, 9th ed.).1875