Inconsistency in publishers' responses to integrity concerns about published research. Evidence and suggested improvements
Authors:
Open Access
- 5 August 2025
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 186, 111918
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Chain retraction: how to stop bad science propagating through the literatureNature, 2024
- How to improve assessments of publication integrityNature, 2024
- Effective quality control in the medical literature: investigation and retraction vs inactionJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2023
- Participant withdrawals were unusually distributed in randomized trials with integrity concerns: a statistical investigationJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
- The thin ret(raction) line: biomedical journal responses to incorrect non-targeting nucleotide sequence reagents in human gene knockdown publicationsScientometrics, 2021
- Correcting the scientific record – A broken system?Accountability in Research, 2020
- Clinical trial registry documents and publication integrityAccountability in Research, 2020
- Check for publication integrity before misconductNature, 2020
- Assessing and Raising Concerns About Duplicate Publication, Authorship Transgressions and Data Errors in a Body of Preclinical ResearchScience and Engineering Ethics, 2019
- Institutional Research Misconduct Reports Need More CredibilityJAMA, 2018