Biases in Random Route Surveys
- 10 June 2016
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
- Vol. 4 (2) , 263-287
Abstract
Although random routes are an important face-to-face sampling method, there is very little research about the procedure. The idea that random route sampling leads to a uniform selection of households has never been tested. This study challenges this notion in a simulation and uses registration office data to verify the impact of selection errors on survey results. All tested routes strongly violate the equal probability assumption and lead to biased expected values in multiple variables. The strongest errors were found in variables that were related to the spatial location of households. Furthermore, errors were related not only to random route instructions but also to the selection of starting points for these routes. This study is of relevance for scientists using random route data for their research as well as for surveys applying random route procedures. Data analysts can use the results to gain an impression about the degree of bias, whereas researchers that use random route samples should view these findings as inducement to improve the random route methodology and develop alternatives.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Selection Errors of Random Route SamplesSociological Methods & Research, 2014
- Das ADM-Stichproben-System (F2F) ab 19972013
- Undercoverage Rates and Undercoverage Bias in Traditional Housing Unit ListingSociological Methods & Research, 2013
- Confirmation Bias in Housing Unit ListingPublic Opinion Quarterly, 2011
- Diagnose von Fehlerquellen und methodische Qualität in der sozialwissenschaftlichen Forschung2002
- Increasing the accuracy of the expanded programme on immunization's cluster survey designAnnals of Epidemiology, 1994
- Interviewer Bias Once More RevisitedJournal of Marketing Research, 1970
- Interviewer Bias RevisitedJournal of Marketing Research, 1965
- Influence of the Interviewer on the Accuracy of Survey ResultsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958
- Interviewers as a Source of Error in SurveysJournal of Marketing, 1955