Staffing Patterns of Primary Care Practices in the Comprehensive Primary Care Initiative
Open Access
- 1 March 2014
- journal article
- Published by Annals of Family Medicine in The Annals of Family Medicine
- Vol. 12 (2) , 142-149
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite growing calls for team-based care, the current staff composition of primary care practices is unknown. We describe staffing patterns for primary care practices in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Comprehensive Primary Care (CPC) initiative. METHODS We undertook a descriptive analysis of CPC initiative practices’ baseline staffing using data from initial applications and a practice survey. CMS selected 502 primary care practices (from 987 applicants) in 7 regions based on their health information technology, number of patients covered by participating payers, and other factors; 496 practices were included in this analysis. RESULTS Consistent with the national distribution, most of the CPC initiative practices included in this study were small: 44% reported 2 or fewer full-time equivalent (FTE) physicians; 27% reported more than 4. Nearly all reported administrative staff (98%) and medical assistants (89%). Fifty-three percent reported having nurse practitioners or physician assistants; 47%, licensed practical or vocational nurses; 36%, registered nurses; and 24%, care managers/coordinators—all of these positions are more common in larger practices. Other clinical staff were reported infrequently regardless of practice size. Compared with other CPC initiative practices, designated patient-centered medical homes were more likely to have care managers/coordinators but otherwise had similar staff types. Larger practices had fewer FTE staff per physician. CONCLUSIONS At baseline, most CPC initiative practices used traditional staffing models and did not report having dedicated staff who may be integral to new primary care models, such as care coordinators, health educators, behavioral health specialists, and pharmacists. Without such staff and payment for their services, practices are unlikely to deliver comprehensive, coordinated, and accessible care to patients at a sustainable cost.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Primary Care: Too Important to FailAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2009
- The effects of interdisciplinary outpatient geriatrics on the use, costs and quality of health services in the fee-for-service environmentAging Clinical and Experimental Research, 2008
- Office-based medical practices: methods and estimates from the national ambulatory medical care survey.2007
- Collaborative Care for DepressionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2006
- Effects of Quality Improvement Strategies for Type 2 Diabetes on Glycemic ControlJAMA, 2006
- Quality Improvement Strategies for Hypertension ManagementMedical Care, 2006
- Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Care Outcomes: A Critical ReviewThe Annals of Family Medicine, 2005
- Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary reviewBMJ, 2003
- A cost analysis of physician assistants in primary care.2002
- How do HMOs achieve savings? The effectiveness of one organization's strategies.1998