Safety and Tolerability of Contezolid Versus Linezolid for Short-Term Treatment of Rifampicin-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis: A Randomized Controlled Study
Authors:
- Jun WangJWJun Wang
- Yu XueYXYu Xue
- Wenjuan NieWNWenjuan Nie
- Liping MaLMLiping Ma
- Naihui ChuNCNaihui Chu
- Yadong DuYDYadong Du
Open Access
- 1 July 2025
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Infection and Drug Resistance
- Vol. ume 18, 3307-3315
Abstract
Purpose: Linezolid is a core drug used to treat rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (RR-TB) and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, adverse events (AEs) have limited its clinical application. Safer alternatives to linezolid are needed to address the safety concerns. Patients and Methods: A total of 27 patients with RR-TB (including MDR-TB) were randomly assigned to receive either contezolid (n=14) or linezolid (n=13) in combination with standardized background anti-TB regimens, that is, linezolid-bedaquiline (pyrazinamide)-levofloxacin (moxifloxacin)-cycloserine-clofazimine or contezolid-bedaquiline (pyrazinamide)-levofloxacin (moxifloxacin)-cycloserine-clofazimine. The dosage was 600 mg q12h for linezolid, and 800 mg q12h for contezolid. AE data were collected during the 2-month treatment period to analyze the characteristics, severity, onset time, duration, drug relatedness, management, and outcome of the adverse drug reactions. Results: The median (range) age of contezolid- and linezolid-treated patients was 40.9 (26– 65) and 36.7 (18– 65) years, respectively. The incidence of AEs was 14.3% (2/14) in contezolid-treated patients and 92.3% (12/13) in linezolid group. All drug-related AEs in contezolid group were gastrointestinal reactions (nausea and vomiting one case each). No peripheral neuropathy or myelosuppression AEs were observed. The AEs in linezolid group included anemia (30.8%, 4/13), peripheral neuropathy (53.8%, 7/13), and gastrointestinal reactions (23.1%, 3/13). Dose reduction or discontinuation was required for linezolid in 84.6% (11/13) of patients. The anti-TB efficacy of contezolid and linezolid was comparable in terms of sputum culture conversion rate and imaging-confirmed lesion absorption rate after treatment for 2 months. Conclusion: Contezolid may be a safer alternative to linezolid based on AE incidence in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis for two months. Clinical Trial Registration: This study was registered at https://www.chictr.org.cn (identifier: ChiCTR2300074234).Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Concentration of contezolid in cerebrospinal fluid and serum in a patient with tuberculous meningoencephalitis: A case reportInternational Journal of Antimicrobial Agents, 2023
- Adverse drug reactions due to linezolid in the programmatic management of drug-resistant tuberculosis in India: A retrospective multicenter studyIndian Journal of Tuberculosis, 2023
- Analysis of Dynamic Efficacy Endpoints of the Nix-TB TrialClinical Infectious Diseases, 2023
- A Phase III multicentre, randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral contezolid versus linezolid in adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infectionsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2022
- Contezolid: First ApprovalDrugs, 2021
- Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of Contezolid at Therapeutic and Supratherapeutic Doses in Healthy Chinese Subjects, and Assessment of Contezolid Dosing Regimens Based on Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic AnalysisClinical Therapeutics, 2019
- In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of Contezolid (MRX-I) against Mycobacterium tuberculosisAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2018
- Short-term Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of MRX-I, an Oxazolidinone Antibacterial Agent, in Healthy Chinese SubjectsClinical Therapeutics, 2018
- Status of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China: A systematic review and meta-analysisAmerican Journal of Infection Control, 2016
- New Potent Antibacterial Oxazolidinone (MRX-I) with an Improved Class Safety Profile2014