Mapping the Oxford hip score onto the EQ-5D utility index
- 22 April 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Quality of Life Research
- Vol. 22 (3) , 665-675
Abstract
To assess different mapping methods for the estimation of a group’s mean EQ-5D score based on responses to the Oxford hip score (OHS) questionnaire. Four models were considered: a) linear regression using total OHS as a continuous regressor; b) linear regression employing responses to the twelve OHS questions as categorical predictors; c) two-part approach combining logistic and linear regression; and d) response mapping. The models were internally validated on the estimation data set, which included OHS and EQ-5D scores for total hip replacements, both before and six months after procedure for 1,759 operations. An external validation was also performed. All models estimated the mean EQ-5D score within 0.005 of an observed health-state utility estimate, ordinary least squares (OLS) continuous being the most accurate and OLS categorical the most consistent. Age, gender and deprivation did not improve the models. More accurate estimations at the individual level were achieved for higher scores of observed OHS and EQ-5D. Based on these results, when EQ-5D scores are not available, answers to the OHS questionnaire can be used to estimate a group’s mean EQ-5D with a high degree of accuracy.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Mapping the QLQ-C30 quality of life cancer questionnaire to EQ-5D patient preferencesThe European Journal of Health Economics, 2010
- A review of studies mapping (or cross walking) non-preference based measures of health to generic preference-based measuresThe European Journal of Health Economics, 2009
- The use of the Oxford hip and knee scoresThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- Using the health assessment questionnaire to estimate preference‐based single indices in patients with rheumatoid arthritisArthritis Care & Research, 2007
- Comparing the Incomparable? A Systematic Review of Competing Techniques for Converting Descriptive Measures of Health Status into QALY-WeightsMedical Decision Making, 2007
- Estimating the Association between SF-12 Responses and EQ-5D Utility Values by Response MappingMedical Decision Making, 2006
- The Oxford hip scores for primary and revision hip replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2005
- Economic evaluation in total hip arthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2004
- Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2001
- Developing the Health Care MarketThe Economic Journal, 1991