Relative contribution of biological variation and technical variables to zone diameter variations of disc diffusion susceptibility testing
- 12 October 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
- Vol. 71 (1) , 141-151
Abstract
Disc diffusion is still largely based on manual procedures. Technical variations originate from inoculum preparation, variations in materials, individual operator plate streaking and reading accuracy. Resulting measurement imprecision contributes to categorization errors. Biological variation resembles the natural fluctuation of a measured parameter such as antibiotic susceptibility around a mean value. It is deemed to originate from factors such as genetic background or metabolic state. This study analysed the relative contribution of different technical and biological factors to total disc diffusion variation. For calculation of relative error factor contribution to disc diffusion variability, five experiments were designed keeping different combinations of error factors constant. A mathematical model was developed to analyse the individual error factor contribution to disc diffusion variation for each of the tested drug–species combinations. The contribution of biological variation to total diameter variance ranged from 10.4% to 98.8% for different drug–species combinations. Highest biological variation was found for Enterococcus faecalis WT and vancomycin (98.8%) and for penicillinase-producing Staphylococcus aureus and penicillin G (96.0%). Average imprecision of automated zone reading revealed that 1.4%–5.3% of total imprecision was due to technical variation, while materials, i.e. antibiotic discs and agar plates, contributed between 2.6% and 3.9%. Inoculum preparation and manual plate streaking contributed 6.8%–24.8% and 6.6%–24.3%, respectively, to total imprecision. This study illustrates the relative contributions of technical factors that account for a significant part of total variance in disc diffusion. The highest relative contribution originated from the operator, i.e. manual inoculum preparation and plate streaking. Further standardization of inoculum preparation and plate streaking by automation could potentially increase the precision of disc diffusion and improve the correlation of susceptibility reports with clinical outcome.Keywords
Funding Information
- University of Zurich
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Emerging Technologies for the Clinical Microbiology LaboratoryClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2014
- Integrating Forecast Probabilities in Antibiograms: a Way To Guide Antimicrobial Prescriptions More Reliably?Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2014
- Point-Counterpoint: The Automated Clinical Microbiology Laboratory: Fact or Fantasy?Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 2014
- Development of the EUCAST disk diffusion antimicrobial susceptibility testing method and its implementation in routine microbiology laboratoriesClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2014
- The critical influence of the intermediate category on interpretation errors in revised EUCAST and CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing guidelinesClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2013
- Rapid Clinical Bacteriology and Its Future ImpactAnnals of Laboratory Medicine, 2013
- Automation in clinical bacteriology: what system to choose?Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 2011
- Statistical characterisation of bacterial wild-type MIC value distributions and the determination of epidemiological cut-off valuesClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2006
- Biochemical and genetic characterization of the action of triclosan on Staphylococcus aureusJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy, 2001
- Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing by a Standardized Single Disk MethodAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1966