Look before you leap - individual variation in social vigilance shapes socio-spatial group properties in an agent-based model
Authors:
Open Access
- 14 March 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology
- Vol. 66 (6) , 931-945
Abstract
Next to predator detection, primate vigilance also serves to keep track of relevant conspecifics. The degree of vigilance towards group members often reflects the dominance rank of an individual: subordinates pay attention to dominants. Although it has been suggested that subordinates’ vigilance may result in spatial centrality of dominants, this has not been addressed in either empirical or modeling studies. Using agent-based models, we determined how social vigilance affects socio-spatial properties of primate groups. A basic model without social vigilance, where individuals avoid potential aggressors (avoidance model), was contrasted with two models that each additionally included a different type of social vigilance: a) monitoring a specific potential aggressor to remain informed on its whereabouts (monitoring model) or b) scanning the whole group to detect potential aggressors (scanning model). Adding monitoring or scanning behavior to the avoidance model reinforced spatial centrality of dominants, a pattern often observed in primates, and resulted in more spread out groups. Moreover, variation in scanning tendency alone was already sufficient to generate spatial centrality of dominants: frequently scanning subordinates could move further away from the group center than dominants, before losing sight of group members. In the monitoring model, two mechanisms caused decreased encounter frequencies among subordinates: a) increased inter-individual distances, and b) frequent monitoring of central dominants. In the scanning model, encounters among subordinates decreased due to increased inter-individual distances. This agent-based model study provides a clear indication that individual variation in social vigilance may be an important structuring feature of primate social groups.Keywords
This publication has 62 references indexed in Scilit:
- Better Safe than Sorry - Socio-Spatial Group Structure Emerges from Individual Variation in Fleeing, Avoidance or Velocity in an Agent-Based ModelPLOS ONE, 2011
- Differences in Nutrient Requirements Imply a Non-Linear Emergence of Leaders in Animal GroupsPLOS Computational Biology, 2010
- Resource distributions affect social learning on multiple timescalesBehavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2009
- The emergence of leaders and followers in foraging pairs when the qualities of individuals differBMC Ecology and Evolution, 2008
- Agent-based modelling as scientific method: a case study analysing primate social behaviourPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007
- An agent-based model of group decision making in baboonsPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 2007
- Attention Structure in MonkeysFolia Primatologica, 1979
- On the advantages of flockingJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1973
- Geometry for the selfish herdJournal of Theoretical Biology, 1971
- Five natural troops of Japanese monkeys in Shodoshima Island (I)Primates, 1966