Quality of life scores differed according to mode of administration in a review of three major oncology questionnaires
Authors:
- Yin Bun CheungYin Bun Cheung
- Cynthia GohCGCynthia Goh
- Julian ThumbooJTJulian Thumboo
- Kei-Siong KhooKKKei-Siong Khoo
- Joseph WeeJWJoseph Wee
- 1 February 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 59 (2) , 185-191
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variability and Sample Size Requirements of Quality-of-Life Measures: A Randomized Study of Three Major QuestionnairesJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2005
- Order effects in the assessment of quality of life in cancer patientsQuality of Life Research, 2004
- Measuring quality of life of Chinese cancer patientsCancer, 2000
- SF-36 scores vary by method of administration: implications for study designJournal of Public Health, 1999
- Are health-related quality-of-life measures affected by the mode of administration?Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1996
- Comparisons of the Costs and Quality of Norms for the SF-36 Health Survey Collected by Mail Versus Telephone Interview: Results From a National SurveyMedical Care, 1994
- Interviewer versus self-administered questionnaires in developing a disease-specific, health-related quality of life instrument for asthmaJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1993
- The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A Quality-of-Life Instrument for Use in International Clinical Trials in OncologyJNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1993
- Factors of importance when evaluating quality of life in clinical trialsControlled Clinical Trials, 1990
- Measuring the quality of life of cancer patients: the Functional Living Index-Cancer: development and validation.Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1984