Evaluation of standard versus nonstandard vital signs monitors in the prehospital and emergency departments
- 1 September 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery
- Vol. 77 (3) , S121-S126
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of using a wireless, portable vital signs monitor (WVSM) for predicting the need for lifesaving interventions (LSIs) in the emergency department (ED) and use a multivariate logistic regression model to determine whether the WVSM was an improved predictor of LSIs in the ED over the standard of care monitor currently being used. This study analyzed 305 consecutive patients transported from the scene via helicopter to a Level I trauma center. For 104 patients in the study, a WVSM was also attached to the patient's arm and used to record and display prehospital and hospital physiologic data in real time on a handheld computer and in the trauma bay. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed for accuracy in predicting needs for LSIs in control and WVSM subjects. In addition, receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained to examine the discriminating power of the models for the outcome of one or more LSIs in the ED. Of the 305 patients, 73 underwent 109 LSIs in the ED. Of these, 21 patients wore the WVSM during transport in addition to the standard monitor. Logistic regression analysis revealed that heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic blood pressure were significantly associated with an increased risk for LSIs in the ED (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis also demonstrated better prediction for LSIs performed in the ED in WVSM subjects than in control subjects (area under the curve, 0.86 vs. 0.81, respectively). The WVSM system leads to improved LSI accuracy in the ED. In addition, many important lessons have been learned in preparation for this study. Adoption of nonstandard vital signs monitors into critical care/trauma medicine may require a new paradigm of personnel education, training, and practice. Therapeutic/care management, level IV.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Phases-of-illness paradigm: better communication, better outcomesCritical Care, 2011
- Detecting Vital Signs with Wearable Wireless SensorsSensors, 2010
- Predicting the Need to Perform Life-Saving Interventions in Trauma Patients by Using New Vital Signs and Artificial Neural Networks2009
- Exploration of Prehospital Vital Sign Trends for the Prediction of Trauma OutcomesPrehospital Emergency Care, 2009
- Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring for Combat CasualtiesMilitary Medicine, 2006
- Integrating Data, Models, and Reasoning in Critical Care2006
- Manual Vital Signs Reliably Predict Need for Life-Saving Interventions in Trauma PatientsJournal of Trauma: Injury, Infection & Critical Care, 2005
- The vexatious vital: Neither clinical measurements by nurses nor an electronic monitor provides accurate measurements of respiratory rate in triageAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2005
- Measuring Blood Pressure AccuratelyJAMA, 2003
- Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithmsAnnals of Emergency Medicine, 2001