Genetic parameters for energy balance, feed efficiency, and related traits in Holstein cattle
Authors:
- 1 September 2012
- journal article
- Published by American Dairy Science Association in Journal of Dairy Science
- Vol. 95 (9) , 5393-5402
Abstract
Objectives of the current study were to estimate genetic parameters in Holstein cows for energy balance (EB) and related traits including dry matter intake (DMI), body weight (BW), body condition score (BCS), energy-corrected milk (ECM) production, and gross feed efficiency (GFE), defined as the ratio of total ECM yield to total DMI over the first 150 d of lactation. Data were recorded for the first half of lactation on 227 and 175 cows in their first or later lactation, respectively. Random regression models were fitted to longitudinal data. Also, each trait was averaged over monthly intervals and analyzed by single and multivariate animal models. Heritability estimates ranged from 0.27 to 0.63, 0.12 to 0.62, 0.12 to 0.49, 0.63 to 0.72, and 0.49 to 0.53 for DMI, ECM yield, EB, BW, and BCS, respectively, averaged over monthly intervals. Daily heritability estimates ranged from 0.18 to 0.30, 0.10 to 0.26, 0.07 to 0.22, 0.43 to 0.67, and 0.25 to 0.38 for DMI, ECM yield, EB, BW, and BCS, respectively. Estimated heritability for GFE was 0.32. The genetic correlation of EB at 10d in milk (DIM) with EB at 150 DIM was -0.19, suggesting the genetic regulation of this trait differs by stage of lactation. Positive genetic correlations were found among DMI, ECM yield, and BW averaged over monthly intervals, whereas correlations of these traits with BCS depended upon stage of lactation. Total ECM yield for the lactation was positively correlated with DMI, but a negative genetic correlation between total ECM yield and EB was found. However, the genetic correlation between total ECM yield and EB in the first month of lactation was -0.02, indicating that total production is not genetically correlated with EB during the first month of lactation, when negative EB is most closely associated with diminished fitness. The genetic correlation between GFE and EB ranged from -0.73 to -0.99, indicating that selection for more efficient cows would favor a lower energy status. However, the genetic correlation between EB in the first month of lactation and GFE calculated from 75 to 150 DIM was not significant, indicating that the unfavorable correlation between GFE and EB in early lactation may be minimized with alternative definitions of efficiency. Thus, EB, GFE and related traits will likely respond to genetic selection in Holstein cows. However, the impact of selection for improved feed efficiency on EB must be carefully considered to avoid potential negative consequences of further reductions in EB at the onset of lactation.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- TRIENNIAL LACTATION SYMPOSIUM: Opportunities for improving milk production efficiency in dairy cattle1,2Journal of Animal Science, 2012
- Evaluation of five lactation curve models fitted for fat:protein ratio of milk and daily energy balanceJournal of Dairy Science, 2010
- Genetic association between body energy measured throughout lactation and fertility in dairy cattleAnimal, 2010
- Analysis of feed intake and energy balance of high-yielding first lactating Holstein cows with fixed and random regression modelsAnimal, 2009
- Differences between primiparous and multiparous dairy cows in the inter-relationships between metabolic traits, milk yield and body condition score in the periparturient periodDomestic Animal Endocrinology, 2007
- Sources of genetic variation in energetic efficiency of dairy cowsLivestock Production Science, 1995
- Genetic aspects of feed intake and efficiency in lactating dairy heifersLivestock Production Science, 1991
- The use of product traits such as lean growth rate as selection criteria in animal breedingAnimal Science, 1987
- ACCOUNTING FOR COVARIANCES AMONG TEST DAY MILK YIELDS IN DAIRY COWSCanadian Journal of Animal Science, 1987
- Adjustment of test-day milk, fat and protein yield for age, season and stage of lactationLivestock Production Science, 1987