Selection of 3D-Printing Optimal Parameters via MCDM for Maximizing the Thermomechanical Response of TPU and PEEK
Open Access
Abstract
The optimization of Fused Filament Fabrication (FFF) process parameters is commonly performed using room-temperature mechanical properties as the main decision criteria, while the temperature-dependent thermomechanical response of printed polymers is often not explicitly considered. This limitation is relevant for functional components intended to operate above room temperature, where stiffness retention and viscoelastic behavior may strongly affect service performance. This work proposes an experimental–statistical framework for selecting FFF parameters by integrating Design of Experiments (DoE), tensile testing, dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), the Entropy Weight Method (EWM) and the VIKOR method. Two materials with contrasting thermomechanical behavior were investigated: a high-performance semicrystalline polymer, Z-PEEK, and an elastomeric thermoplastic, TPU 95A. For each material, a DoE was defined to evaluate the influence of key printing parameters, and the manufactured specimens were characterized in terms of maximum tensile force, maximum deformation and storage modulus at selected temperatures. The ANOVA results showed a material-dependent influence of the processing parameters, with thermally driven parameters being especially relevant for Z-PEEK and deposition-related parameters having a stronger influence on TPU 95A. The EWM–VIKOR analysis identified the optimal Z-PEEK configuration as 400 °C extrusion temperature, 200 °C build plate temperature and 150 °C chamber temperature, whereas the optimal TPU 95A configuration corresponded to 225 °C extrusion temperature, 0.10 mm layer height, 50 mm/s printing speed and 80 °C build plate temperature. Overall, the results demonstrate that incorporating DMA-derived thermomechanical indicators into MCDM-based optimization provides a more application-oriented basis for FFF parameter selection than approaches based only on room-temperature mechanical properties.Keywords
Funding Information
- Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (PID2022-143329OA-I00)
- Comunidad de Madrid (PRODEM-CM-UC3M)
This publication has 40 references indexed in Scilit:
- Additive manufacturing for space applications: A review of materials, methods, and future frontiersChina Welding, 2026
- Influence of Thermal Processing Conditions on Mechanical and Material Properties of 3D Printed Thin-Structures Using PEEK MaterialInternational Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 2022
- Effect of molecular weight on mechanical properties and microstructure of 3D printed poly(ether ether ketone)Polymer International, 2020
- Material extrusion‐based additive manufacturing of polypropylene: A review on how to improve dimensional inaccuracy and warpageJournal of Applied Polymer Science, 2019
- A critical review of fused deposition modeling 3D printing technology in manufacturing polylactic acid partsThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2019
- All‐in‐One Cellulose Nanocrystals for 3D Printing of Nanocomposite HydrogelsAngewandte Chemie International Edition, 2018
- Costs, benefits, and adoption of additive manufacturing: a supply chain perspectiveThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2015
- A model research for prototype warp deformation in the FDM processThe International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 2006
- The morphology of poly(aryl-ether-ether-ketone)Polymer, 1983
- A Mathematical Theory of CommunicationBell System Technical Journal, 1948