Finding the best fit for improving reproducibility: reflections from the QUEST Center for Responsible Research
Authors:
- Natascha DrudeNDNatascha Drude
- Lorena Martinez-GamboaLMLorena Martinez-Gamboa
- Tamarinde HavenTHTamarinde Haven
- Constance HolmanCHConstance Holman
- Martin HolstMHMartin Holst
- Silke KniffertSKSilke Kniffert
- Sarah McCannSMSarah McCann
- Torsten RackollTRTorsten Rackoll
- Robert SchulzRSRobert Schulz
- Sarah WeschkeSWSarah Weschke
Open Access
- 3 August 2022
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Springer Nature in BMC Research Notes
- Vol. 15 (1) , 1-6
Abstract
Increasing the reproducibility and trustworthiness of biomedical research requires engaging stakeholders from all levels in an institutional setting. The QUEST Center for Responsible Research aims to develop and implement new approaches to improve the culture and practice of research, tailored to the needs of these stakeholders. Members of the QUEST Center organised a brainstorm to reflect on the challenges and new opportunities encountered in implementing different projects through QUEST and share the lessons that working groups have learned over the first five years. The authors informally surveyed and interviewed working groups where relevant and highlight common themes that have influenced the success of many projects, including top-down and bottom-up engagement, managing expectations, the availability of expertise, ensuring sustainability, and considering incentives. The commentary authors conclude by encouraging the research community to view initiatives that promote reproducibility not as a one-size-fits-all undertaking, but rather as an opportunity to unite stakeholders and customise drivers of cultural change.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvementHealth Research Policy and Systems, 2018
- Nature journals announce two steps to improve transparencyNature, 2018
- Let’s move beyond the rhetoric: it’s time to change how we judge researchNature, 2018
- Fostering Integrity in Research2017
- A pocket guide to electronic laboratory notebooks in the academic life sciencesF1000Research, 2016
- Project management for academic research projects: balancing structure and flexibilityInternational Journal of Project Organisation and Management, 2015
- Biomedical research: increasing value, reducing wasteThe Lancet, 2014
- The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventionsImplementation Science, 2011
- Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidenceThe Lancet, 2009
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLOS Medicine, 2005