A comparative study of the status of supportive-palliative care provision in Iran and selected countries: Strengths and weaknesses
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Education and Health Promotion
- Vol. 10 (1)
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Terminally, illnesses such as cancer, AIDS, dementia, and advanced heart disease will require special supportive and palliative care, although a few numbers of these patients are provided with these services. The aim of the present study was to perform a comparative study of supportive-palliative care provision in selected countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This research was a descriptive comparative study that its research population was the frameworks of palliative and supportive care provision in Egypt, Turkey, America, Australia, Canada, the Netherlands, and China. These frameworks were compared across six dimensions of service receivers, financing, providers, service provider centers, type of services provided, and training. Data collection tool has included the checklist and information sources, documents, evidence, articles, books, and journals collected through the Internet and organizations related to the health information of selected countries and by the library search. Data were investigated and analyzed using the data collection tool and checklists. FINDINGS: The findings showed that the developed countries having decentralized trusteeship structure had a more favorable status in palliative and supportive care provision. The type of services provided was a combination of mental, psychological, social, spiritual, financial, and physical and communication services. Provider centers included hospital, the elderly, and cancer and charity centers. CONCLUSION: Regarding the investigation and recognition of the status of supportive-palliative care provision, it was observed that the provision of these services was a concern of the selected countries, but they did not have a defined model or pattern to provide these services. Therefore, it is suggested that each country takes a step to redesign and define frameworks and structures in the evolution of supportive-palliative cares in accordance with the particular conditions, indigenous culture, religion, and other effective cases of that country and pays special attention to the role and position of supportive-palliative cares.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- A National Strategy For Palliative CareHealth Affairs, 2017
- The World report on ageing and health: a policy framework for healthy ageingThe Lancet, 2016
- Community Palliative Care in TurkeyJournal of Public Health Management & Practice, 2016
- Attitudes and knowledge of Iranian nurses about hospice careIndian Journal of Palliative Care, 2015
- Patient's rights charter in Iran.2014
- Nurses' knowledge about palliative care in Southeast IranPalliative and Supportive Care, 2013
- Importance of social support in diabetes careJournal of Education and Health Promotion, 2013
- Concepts and definitions for “supportive care,” “best supportive care,” “palliative care,” and “hospice care” in the published literature, dictionaries, and textbooksSupportive Care in Cancer, 2012
- Social Cognition in Bulimia Nervosa: A Systematic ReviewEuropean Psychiatry, 2011
- Determinants of Treatment Intensity for Patients with Serious Illness: A New Conceptual FrameworkJournal of Palliative Medicine, 2010