Density Allowances for Broilers: Where to Set the Limits?
Author:
Open Access
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Poultry Science
- Vol. 86 (6) , 1265-1272
Abstract
Stocking density has critical implications for the broiler industry because higher returns can be obtained as the number of birds per unit space increases. Assigned densities have been primarily driven by cost-benefit analysis, but economic profit may come at the cost of reduced bird performance, health, and welfare if densities are excessive. These negative consequences are the primary reason for the increasing demands for guidelines that limit density allowances, even through legislation. Current recommended densities are rather variable, and therefore it is critical if guidelines are to be established that they be based on sound science. Published research consistently indicates that the health and welfare of broilers is compromised if space allowances drop below 0.0625 to 0.07 m2/bird (equivalent to about 34 to 38 kg/m2 depending on final BW). Negative consequences include reduced final BW, feed intake and food conversion, and greater incidence of foot-pad dermatitis, scratches, bruising, poorer feathering, and condemnations. A few studies have also found higher mortalities, tibial dischondroplasia, and some evidence of physiological stress. At the behavioral level, most studies indicate a reduction in space use and movement and higher frequencies of disturbances, which has been linked with a higher frequency of scratches and decline in carcass quality. Other main behavioral categories remain largely unchanged. However, results overwhelmingly suggest that while stocking density has major consequences for the health and welfare of broilers, the quality of the environment, which has been largely underestimated, is far more relevant. Advances in broiler welfare will be difficult to achieve unless some criteria for environmental quality are also established. The implications of this are that the welfare of broilers can be ensured at a range of (reasonable) densities, as long as the requirements for environmental quality are fulfilled. It is also essential for industry to realize that returns per unit of space in broiler production do tend to plateau if density is excessive, a result of the reduction in bird performance. In this paper I suggest a model that may be used to maximize productivity, health, and welfare.Keywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Forced to crowd or choosing to cluster? Spatial distribution indicates social attraction in broiler chickensAnimal Behaviour, 2006
- Chicken welfare is influenced more by housing conditions than by stocking densityNature, 2004
- Reliability and validity of a modified gait scoring system and its use in assessing tibial dyschondroplasia in broilersBritish Poultry Science, 2002
- Influence of light-dark schedules and stocking density on behaviour, risk of leg problems and occurrence of chronic fear in broilersBritish Poultry Science, 2002
- Monitoring leg problems in broilers: a survey of commercial broiler production in DenmarkWorld's Poultry Science Journal, 2001
- Influence of Stocking Density on Tonic Immobility, Lameness, and Tibial Dyschondroplasia in BroilersJournal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 2001
- Wet litter and perches as risk factors for the development of foot pad dermatitis in floor-housed hensBritish Poultry Science, 1998
- Prevalence of leg weakness in broiler chickens and its relationship with genotypeVeterinary Record, 1992
- Influence of claw clipping, stocking density and feeding space on the incidence of scabby hips in broilersBritish Poultry Science, 1991
- Broiler performance under high stocking densitiesBritish Poultry Science, 1988