Diagnostic Performance of New Commercial Interferon-Gamma Release Assays for Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infection: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Open Access
- 25 February 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Clinical Infectious Diseases
- Vol. 82 (6) , e1353-e1364
Abstract
Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) currently endorses several commercial interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs); policy updates are needed given the development of new tests. We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis to compare sensitivity, specificity, and agreement of newly commercialized IGRAs with WHO-endorsed IGRAs. Methods: Databases (Medline, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform) were searched for studies published from 1 February 2021 to 30 September 2024, then again up to 16 December 2025. We included cross-sectional, cohort, and case-control studies and assessed risk of bias using QUADAS-2. The primary outcomes were pooled differences in sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between the new IGRAs and WHO-endorsed IGRAs. Results: From 3039 records screened, 39 reports (36 published) describing 8 new IGRAs met eligibility: STANDARD E TB-Feron, LIAISON XL Analyzer (chemiluminescence immunoassay [CLIA]), Ichroma IGRA-TB, STANDARD F TB-Feron, VIDAS TB-IGRA, ASACIR.TB, Wantai CLIA, and AdvanSureI3 TB-IGRA. STANDARD E TB-Feron had nonsignificantly lower sensitivity (−2.8% [95% confidence interval {CI}, −11.8% to 6.2%]) and specificity (−3.6% [95% CI, −10.0% to 2.7%]), with kappa of 0.802 (95% CI, .729–.874]), compared to QFT-Plus. For LIAISON XL Analyzer, the specificity was 0.1% higher (95% CI, −6.2% to 6.4%) than QFT-Plus/QFT-GIT, with a pooled kappa of 0.846 (95% CI, .814–.878). Conclusions: Two of the 8 new tests reviewed showed promising accuracy and high agreement with WHO-endorsed IGRAs. The overall certainty of evidence remains low due to risk of bias and imprecision. High-quality, independent studies in diverse populations and settings are needed to inform future WHO recommendations for tuberculosis infection tests. Clinical Trials Registration. PROSPERO (CRD42024544404).Keywords
Funding Information
- Global TB Programme
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Accuracy of VIDASⓇ TB-IGRA in TB patients and individuals with different thresholds of exposureInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2025
- VIDAS® TB-IGRA assay for diagnosing tuberculosis infection in people living with HIV: A preliminary studyInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2025
- Diagnostic accuracy study of STANDARD TB-Feron FIA and STANDARD TB-Feron ELISA tests for tuberculosis infection diagnosis in Eastern European settingJournal of Clinical Tuberculosis and Other Mycobacterial Diseases, 2025
- Adherence to preventive treatment for latent tuberculosis infection in close contacts of pulmonary tuberculosis patients: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in ChinaInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2024
- VIDAS3® TB-IGRA assay: evaluation of performance characteristics in a predominantly low risk, low incidence populationDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2023
- Comparison of the QuantiFERON-TB® Gold Plus on LIAISON® XL and T-SPOT.TB for the diagnosis of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in a low tuberculosis incidence populationDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease, 2022
- Evaluation of a lateral flow assay–based IFN-γ release assay as a point-of-care test for the diagnosis of latent tuberculosis infectionClinical Rheumatology, 2021
- How are high burden countries implementing policies and tools for latent tuberculosis infection? A survey of current practices and barriersHealth Science Reports, 2020
- Prevalence of latent tuberculosis infection among healthcare workers in China as detected by two interferon-gamma release assaysJournal of Hospital Infection, 2013
- Evaluation of a new interferon-gamma release assay and comparison to tuberculin skin test during a tuberculosis outbreakInternational Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2012