Use of the Brief-BESTest partially instrumented with accelerometry to detect balance deterioration in middle-age
Authors:
Open Access
- 9 November 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research
- Vol. 36 (1) , 1-10
Abstract
Background: Most standardized balance tests cannot detect subtle balance deterioration in middle age, or identify those at higher risk for accelerated balance decline due to a ceiling effect. Aims: To determine whether the Brief Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Brief-BESTest), partially instrumented with accelerometry, can detect balance deterioration in middle age and identify individuals with poor balance. Methods: We studied young (25.3 ± 2.3 years), early middle-aged (47.7 ± 2.6 years), and late middle-aged adults (60.6 ± 3.6 years), with 25 participants in each age group. Subjects wore an accelerometer on their lower back while performing the Brief-BESTest. Balance measurements included the Brief-BESTest total and sub-measures scores, and postural sway during the Brief-BESTest standing tasks, calculated by the 95% confidence ellipse trajectory of the center of mass (COM-95% ellipse). Results: Compared to the two middle-aged groups, young adults had better total Brief-BESTest and sub-measures scores, apart from the Stability-in-Gait sub-measure, and less postural sway during the Sensory-Orientation sub-measure. The total Brief-BESTest scores as well as the Biomechanical-Constraints and Sensory-Orientation sub-measures differed also between early and late middle-aged adults. Both the Brief-BESTest total scores and the Sensory-Orientation postural sway values demonstrated increased variation with age, allowing to identify subjects with poor balance. A moderate negative correlation (r = -0.43) was found between the Brief-BESTest total score and the COM-95% ellipse size, and a moderate agreement (k = 0.56) in identifying subjects with poor performance in the early but not the late middle age group. Conclusions: The Brief-BESTest test combined with accelerometry could be a suitable screening tool to identify middle-aged people with early balance deterioration and potentially identify those with poor balance and a possible higher risk for falls. Clinicians and policymakers can use our findings to implement balance assessment programs in patients < 65 years, leading to preventive strategies before the risk increases.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- Incidence of and County Variation in Fall Injuries in US Residents Aged 65 Years or Older, 2016-2019JAMA Network Open, 2022
- Prevalence of Activity Limitations and Association with Multimorbidity Among US Adults 50 to 64 Years OldJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2019
- Comparisons of Interventions for Preventing Falls in Older AdultsJAMA, 2017
- Quantifying effects of age on balance and gait with inertial sensors in community-dwelling healthy adultsExperimental Gerontology, 2016
- Center-of-pressure based postural sway measures: Reliability and ability to distinguish between age, fear of falling and fall historyInternational Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2015
- Quantification of postural stability in older adults using mobile technologyExperimental Brain Research, 2014
- Age-Related Hip Proprioception Declines: Effects on Postural Sway and Dynamic BalanceArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2014
- Gender Differences in Seeking Care for Falls in the Aged Medicare PopulationAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2012
- Disorders of Balance and Vestibular Function in US AdultsArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2009
- Living Alone and Fall Risk Factors in Community-Dwelling Middle Age and Older AdultsJournal of Community Health, 2009