Aesthetic grading causes food losses without financially benefiting farmers: Micro-level evidence from China’s fresh apple supply chain
Authors:
Open Access
- 20 September 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Waste Management & Research: The Journal for a Sustainable Circular Economy
- Vol. 43 (6) , 957-968
Abstract
International literature is lacking quantified information about the impact of raising demands for attractive appearances and the private standards on food loss and associated effects on the economy, the environment and social issues. Given the global scale and significance to food consumption and health, fresh apples were selected for researching the issues. By focusing on China, the major production region of fresh apple in the world where the effects of aesthetic preference and shape abnormality are substantial, the present study aims to gain insights into the on-farm grading processes and different marketing channels for fresh apples in China. It was discovered that 35% of the volume in China’s major production areas of fresh apples were graded by aesthetic characteristics such as ripeness, colour, fragrance, bruising, intactness and appealing appearance. About 17.1% of production on average were considered as food losses mainly caused by such grading schemes. Favouring ‘perfect’ appearance; however, the grading did not yield economic benefits for smallholders. Lastly, direct procurement by supermarkets had a depressive effect on the price of fresh apples at the farm gate. The study has a unique value for global debates and actions against food loss and waste as it quantifies on-farm post-harvest losses of fresh apples by different agri-food chain organizations in China with respect to mass and economic value.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Key Research and Development Program of China (2023YFE0105000)
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (72003148)
- Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2023-AII)
This publication has 48 references indexed in Scilit:
- Farmer harvest decisions and vegetable loss in primary productionAgricultural Systems, 2019
- Doing but not knowing: how apple farmers comply with standards in ChinaAgriculture and Human Values, 2018
- How origin, packaging and seasonality determine the environmental impact of apples, magnified by food waste and lossesThe International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 2018
- Food Waste, Power, and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Australian Food Supply ChainJournal of Business Ethics, 2016
- How should we farm? The ethical dimension of farming systems2012
- Introduction to symposium on private agrifood governance: values, shortcomings and strategiesAgriculture and Human Values, 2011
- Actors in private food governance: the legitimacy of retail standards and multistakeholder initiatives with civil society participationAgriculture and Human Values, 2009
- The Many Legal Institutions that Support Contractual Commitments2005
- Market Institutions and Judicial Rulemaking2005
- Quality and Grading Risk2002