A “Rapid Best‐Fit” model for framework synthesis: Using research objectives to structure analysis within a rapid review of qualitative evidence
Open Access
- 1 October 2020
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Research Synthesis Methods
- Vol. 12 (3) , 368-383
Abstract
The short time frame associated with rapid reviews can be challenging for researchers conducting qualitative evidence synthesis. In these circumstances a Best‐Fit Framework Synthesis, drawing upon existing theory and/or research, may be conducted to rapidly make sense of qualitative evidence. This article discusses a “Rapid Best‐Fit” approach to conducting Framework Synthesis within an 6‐week rapid systematic review of qualitative evidence. In the absence of a suitable theoretical model to inform the synthesis, we drew upon our research objectives to structure a framework, and to identify the studies which contained the most relevant data. Themes from these studies were used to revise the initial framework before inductive thematic synthesis finalized theme content. This “Rapid Best‐Fit” approach yielded results aligned with the needs of the commissioners of the review and is a useful addition to qualitative synthesis methods, allowing for the incorporation of diverse views and experiences into fast‐paced decision making scenarios.Keywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Perspectives on medicine adherence in service users and carers with experience of legally sanctioned detention and medication: a qualitative studyPatient Preference and Adherence, 2013
- “Best fit” framework synthesis: refining the methodBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2013
- Clarifying differences between review designs and methodsSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Family Caregivers' Experiences of Involuntary Psychiatric Hospital Admissions of Their Relatives – a Qualitative StudyPLOS ONE, 2011
- Using framework-based synthesis for conducting reviews of qualitative studiesBMC Medicine, 2011
- The views of policy influencers and mental health officers concerning the Named Person provisions of the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003Journal of Mental Health, 2010
- Service-user and carer perspectives on compliance and compulsory treatment in community mental health servicesHealth & Social Care in the Community, 2009
- Service users’ and carers’ views of the Named Person provisions under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003Journal of Mental Health, 2009
- A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services researchHealth Expectations, 2008
- Research into the Mental Health Act: A qualitative study of the views of those using or affected by itJournal of Mental Health, 2001