The Spectrum of Complications Following Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement
- 17 September 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Journal of Cardiac Surgery
- Vol. 27 (5) , 630-638
Abstract
Introduction: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support is associated with many complications, but relatively few studies have examined the full spectrum of complications beyond infectious and bleeding events. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients receiving either a pulsatile‐flow Heartmate XVE (HM1; Thoratec Corp., Pleasanton, CA, USA) or continuous‐flow Heartmate II (HM2; Thoratec Corp.) LVAD at our institution (June 2000 to March 2012). Frequency and date of onset of nonbleeding, noninfectious complications were examined. Results: One hundred eighty‐two LVADs were implanted, 49 HM1, and 133 HM2. Support duration was longer for HM2s (median 358 vs. 112 days; p = 0.0003). Overall, the most frequent complications were respiratory failure, ventricular arrhythmia, atrial arrhythmia, right heart failure, and renal failure. Respiratory failure, arrhythmias, severe psychiatric events, and renal failure all occurred with median date of onset ≤ seven days postprocedure. Right heart failure, hepatic failure, thromboembolism, and transient ischemic attacks had a median date of onset 8 to 30 days postprocedure. Stroke, hemolysis, and device failure occurred mostly more than a month postoperatively. Right heart failure, hepatic failure, and device failure were more frequent in HM1 patients than in HM2 patients. Several events, including stroke, had much later onset in HM2 patients. Conclusion: In this 10‐year review of complications following LVAD implantation, the most common adverse events tended to occur early after implantation. As pulsatile‐flow HM1s showed greater frequency and earlier onset of some adverse events, our data suggest better overall outcomes with the continuous‐flow HM2s. (J Card Surg 2012;27:630‐638)Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Long-Term Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Support and End-Organ Function: Prospects for Destination TherapyJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 2010
- Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device Improves Functional Capacity and Quality of Life of Advanced Heart Failure PatientsJACC, 2010
- Bridge to Heart Transplantation with Left Ventricular Assist Device Versus Inotropic Agents in Status 1 PatientsJournal of Cardiac Surgery, 2009
- Clinical outcome and bridge to transplant rate of left ventricular assist device recipient patients: comparison between continuous-flow and pulsatile-flow devices☆European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Long‐Term Destination Therapy With the HeartMate XVE Left Ventricular Assist Device: Improved Outcomes Since the REMATCH StudyCongestive Heart Failure, 2005
- Bridging to transplant with the HeartMate left ventricular assist device: The Columbia Presbyterian 12-year experienceThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2004
- Multicenter clinical evaluation of the HeartMate vented electric left ventricular assist system in patients awaiting heart transplantationThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2001
- Long-Term Use of a Left Ventricular Assist Device for End-Stage Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Bridge Experience With Long-term Implantable Left Ventricular Assist DevicesCirculation, 1997
- Improved Mortality and Rehabilitation of Transplant Candidates Treated with a Long-Term Implantable Left Ventricular Assist SystemAnnals of Surgery, 1995