Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Why Do We Use Rigid Dilators?
- 1 September 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Endourology
- Vol. 22 (9) , 1877-1880
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Variables That Influence HemorrhageUrology, 2007
- Comparative Study of Degree of Renal Trauma Between Amplatz Sequential Fascial Dilation and Balloon Dilation During Percutaneous Renal Surgery in an Animal ModelUrology, 2007
- Minimizing and managing bleeding after percutaneous nephrolithotomyCurrent Opinion in Urology, 2007
- Impact of Percutaneous Access Point Number and Location on Complication and Success Rates in Percutaneous NephrolithotomyUrologia Internationalis, 2006
- Access Related Complications During Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: Urology Versus Radiology at a Single Academic InstitutionJournal of Urology, 2006
- Percutaneous nephrolithotomy with ultrasonography‐guided renal access: experience from over 300 casesBJU International, 2005
- Failed percutaneous balloon dilation for renal access: Incidence and risk factorsUrology, 2005
- Nephrostomy Tract Dilation Using a Balloon Dilator in Percutaneous Renal Surgery: Experience with 95 Cases and Comparison with the Fascial Dilator SystemUrologia Internationalis, 2003
- Influence of Technique of Percutaneous Tract Creation on Incidence of Renal HemorrhageJournal of Urology, 1997