A Dirty Dozen: Twelve P-Value Misconceptions
- 1 July 2008
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Seminars in Hematology
- Vol. 45 (3) , 135-140
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Medicine Residents' Understanding of the Biostatistics and Results in the Medical LiteratureJAMA, 2007
- How Not to Interpret a P Value?JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2007
- Incongruence between test statistics and P values in medical papersBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2004
- P-Values and Confidence Intervals: Two Sides of the Same Unsatisfactory CoinJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Significance QuestingAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1986
- Statistical ritual in clinical journals: is there a cure?--I.BMJ, 1984
- Clinical Trials and Statistical Verdicts: Probable Grounds for AppealAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1983
- XXXIV. The other side of ‘statistical significance’: alpha, beta. delta, and the calculation of sample sizeClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1975
- The significance of "nonsignificance"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 1963
- Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research.Psychological Review, 1963