Cobalt, Linac, or Other: What Is the Best Solution for Radiation Therapy in Developing Countries?
Authors:
- 1 July 2014
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in International Journal of Radiation Oncology - Biology - Physics (IJROBP)
- Vol. 89 (3) , 476-480
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- Dosimetric inter-institutional comparison in European radiotherapy centres: Results of IAEA supported treatment planning system auditActa Oncologica, 2013
- Clinical Audit in Radiation Oncology: Results from One Academic Centre in Delhi, IndiaAsian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2013
- Status of radiotherapy resources in Africa: an International Atomic Energy Agency analysisThe Lancet Oncology, 2013
- Dosimetric verification of radiotherapy treatment planning systems in Serbia: national auditRadiation Oncology, 2012
- Global estimates of cancer prevalence for 27 sites in the adult population in 2008International Journal of Cancer, 2012
- Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008International Journal of Cancer, 2010
- Has the time come for doing away with Cobalt-60 teletherapy for cancer treatmentsJournal of Medical Physics, 2009
- Ötvenéves a telekobalt-terápia MagyarországonMagyar Onkologia, 2008
- Quantitative status of resources for radiation therapy in Asia and Pacific regionRadiotherapy and Oncology, 2001
- Radiation therapy in Africa: distribution and equipmentRadiotherapy and Oncology, 1999