Is 2 mm a wide margin in high-grade conventional chondrosarcomas of the pelvis?
- 1 June 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery in The Bone & Joint Journal
- Vol. 103-B (6) , 1150-1154
Abstract
Aims: Controversy exists as to what should be considered a safe resection margin to minimize local recurrence in high-grade pelvic chondrosarcomas (CS). The aim of this study is to quantify what is a safe margin of resection for high-grade CS of the pelvis. Methods: We retrospectively identified 105 non-metastatic patients with high-grade pelvic CS of bone who underwent surgery (limb salvage/amputations) between 2000 and 2018. There were 82 (78%) male and 23 (22%) female patients with a mean age of 55 years (26 to 84). The majority of the patients underwent limb salvage surgery (n = 82; 78%) compared to 23 (22%) who had amputation. In total, 66 (64%) patients were grade 2 CS compared to 38 (36%) grade 3 CS. All patients were assessed for stage, pelvic anatomical classification, type of resection and reconstruction, margin status, local recurrence, distant recurrence, and overall survival. Surgical margins were stratified into millimetres: < 1 mm; > 1 mm but < 2 mm; and > 2 mm. Results: The disease-specific survival (DSS) at five years was 69% (95% confidence interval (CI) 56% to 81%) and 51% (95% CI 31% to 70%) for grade 2 and 3 CS, respectively (p = 0.092). The local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) at five years was 59% (95% CI 45% to 72%) for grade 2 CS and 42% (95% CI 21% to 63%) for grade 3 CS (p = 0.318). A margin of more than 2 mm was a significant predictor of increased LRFS (p = 0.001). There was a tendency, but without statistical significance, for a > 2 mm margin to be a predictor of improved DSS. Local recurrence (LR) was a highly significant predictor of DSS, analyzed in a competing risk model (p = 0.001). Conclusion: Obtaining wide margins in the pelvis remains challenging for high-grade pelvic CS. On the basis of our study, we conclude that it is necessary to achieve at least a 2 mm margin for optimal oncological outcomes in patients with high-grade CS of the pelvis. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6):1150–1154.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Novel System for the Surgical Staging of Primary High-grade Osteosarcoma: The Birmingham ClassificationClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2017
- Is computer navigation when used in the surgery of iliosacral pelvic bone tumours safer for the patient?The Bone & Joint Journal, 2017
- The effect of the setting of a positive surgical margin in soft tissue sarcomaCancer, 2014
- Can computer navigation-assisted surgery reduce the risk of an intralesional margin and reduce the rate of local recurrence in patients with a tumour of the pelvis or sacrum?The Bone & Joint Journal, 2013
- Surgical treatment and outcome of conventional pelvic chondrosarcomaThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2005
- The Concept of Curative Margin in Surgery for Bone and Soft Tissue SarcomaClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2004
- Treatment and Outcome of Recurrent Pelvic ChondrosarcomaClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2002
- Soft Tissue Reconstruction of Megaprostheses Using a Trevira TubeClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 2001
- New method of evaluating the surgical margin and safety margin for musculoskeletal sarcoma, analysed on the basis of 457 surgical casesJournal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology, 1995
- Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone.A clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic gradingCancer, 1977