Predictors and Outcomes Associated with Bariatric Robotic Delivery: An MBSAQIP Analysis of 318,151 Patients
Open Access
- 18 July 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Vol. 13 (14) , 4196
Abstract
Background: The adoption of robotic bariatric surgery has increased dramatically over the last decade. While outcomes comparing bariatric and laparoscopic approaches are debated, little is known about patient factors responsible for the growing delivery of robotic surgery. A better understanding of these factors will help guide the planning of bariatric delivery and resource allocation. Methods: Data were extracted from the MBSAQIP registry from 2020 to 2021. The patient population was organized into primary robot-assisted sleeve gastrectomy or Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) versus those who underwent laparoscopic procedures. Bivariate analysis and multivariable logistic regression modeling were conducted to characterize cohort differences and identify independent patient predictors of robotic selection. Results: Of 318,151, 65,951 (20.7%) underwent robot-assisted surgery. Patients undergoing robotic procedures were older (43.4 ± 11.8 vs. 43.1 ± 11.8; p < 0.001) and had higher body mass index (BMI; 45.4 ± 7.9 vs. 45.0 ± 7.6; p < 0.001). Robotic cases had higher rates of medical comorbidities, including sleep apnea, hyperlipidemia, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and diabetes mellitus. Robotic cases were more likely to undergo RYGB (27.4% vs. 26.4%; p < 0.001). Robotic patients had higher rates of numerous complications, including bleed, reoperation, and reintervention, resulting in higher serious complication rates on multivariate analysis. Independent predictors of robotic selection included increased BMI (aOR 1.02), female sex (aOR 1.04), GERD (aOR 1.12), metabolic dysfunction, RYGB (aOR 1.08), black racial status (aOR 1.11), and lower albumin (aOR 0.84). Conclusions: After adjusting for comorbidities, patients with greater metabolic comorbidities, black racial status, and those undergoing RYGB were more likely to receive robotic surgery. A more comprehensive understanding of patient factors fueling the adoption of robotic delivery, as well as those expected to benefit most, is needed to better guide healthcare resources as the landscape of bariatric surgery continues to evolve.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Current progress in robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at a high‐volume centerAnnals of Gastroenterological Surgery, 2023
- A 5-year characterization of trends and outcomes in elderly patients undergoing elective bariatric surgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2023
- Does ASA classification effectively risk stratify patients undergoing bariatric surgery: a MBSAQIP retrospective cohort of 138,612 of patientsSurgical Endoscopy, 2023
- Selection of Robotic Bariatric Surgery Candidates: a Nationwide AnalysisJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2023
- Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registrySurgical Endoscopy, 2020
- Trends in the Adoption of Robotic Surgery for Common Surgical ProceduresJAMA Network Open, 2020
- Robotic bariatric surgery: A general review of the current statusThe International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, 2017
- The Effectiveness and Risks of Bariatric SurgeryJAMA Surgery, 2014
- Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) in obese adults ages 18 to 65 years: a systematic review and economic analysisSurgical Endoscopy, 2013
- Learning curve for robot-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypassSurgical Endoscopy, 2011