Comprehensive Prospective Comparative Analysis of Outcomes Between Open and Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Conducted in 2003 to 2005
- 1 May 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Urology
- Vol. 179 (5) , 1811-1817
Abstract
In a nonrandomized prospective fashion we compared the oncological, functional and morbidity outcomes after laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy. Between January 2003 and December 2005 a total of 1,430 consecutive men with clinically localized prostate cancer underwent radical prostatectomy, laparoscopic in 612 and retropubic in 818. The surgical approach was selected by the patient. Preoperative staging, respective surgical techniques, pathological examination and followup were uniform. Functional outcome was measured by patient completed health related quality of life questionnaire. Positive surgical margin rates (11%) and freedom from progression (median followup 18 months) were comparable between laparoscopic and retropubic radical prostatectomy (HR 0.99 for laparoscopic vs retropubic radical prostatectomy, p = 0.9). We found no significant association between operation type and time to postoperative potency (HR 1.04 for laparoscopic vs retropubic radical prostatectomy; 95% CI 0.74, 1.46; p = 0.8). Patients who underwent laparoscopic radical prostatectomy were less likely to become continent than those treated with retropubic radical prostatectomy (HR 0.56 for laparoscopic vs retropubic radical prostatectomy; 95% CI 0.44, 0.70; p <0.0005). Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was associated with less blood loss (mean ml +/- SD 315 +/- 186 vs 1,267 +/- 660) and lower overall transfusion rate (3% vs 49%). No significant difference was noted in cardiovascular, thromboembolic and urinary complications. Emergency room visits and readmissions were higher after laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (15% vs 11% and 4.6% vs 1.2%, respectively). At our institution and during the study period laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and retropubic radical prostatectomy provided comparable oncological efficacy. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy was associated with less blood loss and a lower transfusion rate, and higher postoperative hospital visits and readmission rate. While the recovery of potency was equivalent, that of continence was superior after retropubic radical prostatectomy.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy for patients with symptomatic cholecystolithiasisCochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006
- Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Critical Analysis of Surgical QualityEuropean Urology, 2006
- LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY WITH THE HEILBRONN TECHNIQUE: ONCOLOGICAL RESULTS IN THE FIRST 500 PATIENTSJournal of Urology, 2005
- Laparoscopic radical prostatectomyUrologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 2004
- Laparoscopic Versus Open Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Study at a Single InstitutionJournal of Urology, 2003
- Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: Oncological Evaluation After 1,000 Cases at Montsouris InstituteJournal of Urology, 2003
- Outcome and complications of radical prostatectomy in patients with PSA <10 ng/ml: comparison between the retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic approachProstate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases, 2002
- Laparoscopic Radical ProstatectomyEuropean Urology, 2001
- Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: Initial short-term experienceUrology, 1997
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional update1997