Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems
Preprint
Abstract
We present a formal theory of contextuality for a set of random variables grouped into different subsets (contexts) corresponding to different, mutually incompatible conditions. Within each context the random variables are jointly distributed, but across different contexts they are stochastically unrelated. The theory of contextuality is based on the analysis of the extent to which some of these random variables can be viewed as preserving their identity across different contexts when one considers all possible joint distributions imposed on the entire set of the random variables. We illustrate the theory on three systems of traditional interest in quantum physics (and also in non-physical, e.g., behavioral studies). These are systems of the Klyachko-Can-Binicioglu-Shumovsky-type, Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bell-type, and Suppes-Zanotti-Leggett-Garg-type. Listed in this order, each of them is formally a special case of the previous one. For each of them we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for contextuality while allowing for experimental errors and contextual biases or signaling. Based on the same principles that underly these derivations we also propose a measure for the degree of contextuality and compute it for the three systems in question.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring Observable Quantum Contextuality2016
- Necessary and Sufficient Conditions for an Extended Noncontextuality in a Broad Class of Quantum Mechanical SystemsPhysical Review Letters, 2015
- No-Forcing and No-Matching Theorems for Classical Probability Applied to Quantum MechanicsFoundations of Physics, 2014
- Order-distance and other metric-like functions on jointly distributed random variablesProceedings of the American Mathematical Society, 2013
- How much contextuality?Natural Computing, 2012
- Simple Test for Hidden Variables in Spin-1 SystemsPhysical Review Letters, 2008
- QUANTUM MECHANICAL PROBABILITIES AND GENERAL PROBABILISTIC CONSTRAINTS FOR EINSTEIN–PODOLSKY–ROSEN–BOHM EXPERIMENTSFoundations of Physics Letters, 2000
- When are probabilistic explanations possible?Synthese, 1981
- Experimental consequences of objective local theoriesPhysical Review D, 1974
- Probability, random variables, and selectivity1920