Measuring Psychosocial Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury: Psychometric Properties of a New Scale
Authors:
- Robyn TateRTRobyn Tate
- Adeline HodgkinsonAHAdeline Hodgkinson
- Ahmed VeerabangsaAVAhmed Veerabangsa
- Silvia MaggiottoSMSilvia Maggiotto
- 1 December 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation
- Vol. 14 (6) , 543-557
Abstract
To determine the psychometric properties of the Sydney Psychosocial Reintegration Scale (SPRS), an instrument developed to quantify disability and handicap in persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Descriptive correlational study. Brain Injury Rehabilitation Unit and Brain Injury Outpatient Clinic. Two samples, a “subacute” group (n = 20) and a “long-term” group (n = 40), were studied to examine responsiveness (subacute group), reliability, and validity (long-term group) of the SPRS. The SPRS is a 12-item questionnaire measuring three domains of everyday living commonly disrupted after severe TBI: occupational activities, interpersonal relationships, and independent living skills. Patients in the subacute group were rated with the SPRS by a clinician at admission to the rehabilitation unit and again three months later or at discharge from the unit (whichever occurred first). For individuals from the long-term group attending the outpatient clinic, a close relative was interviewed with the SPRS and other validating measures. The SPRS was readministered one month later. Internal consistency of the SPRS was high (alpha coefficient = .90), as was agreement between raters and stability over a one-month period (ri = .95 and .90, respectively). Reliability and stability coefficients for the three domains of the scale were also high, ranging from .86 to .94 for reliability and .77 to .93 for stability. Preliminary evidence for construct validity was established with a number of standard instruments, with evidence of both convergent and discriminant construct validity from the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The SPRS was sensitive to group differences on the Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) and to changes occurring during the period of active recovery. The results suggest that the SPRS has sound psychometric properties, being a reliable, stable, sensitive, and valid instrument. It is potentially useful in both clinical and research settings.Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- Measuring the Long-Term Outcomes of Traumatic Brain Injury: A Review of the Community Integration QuestionnaireJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1997
- Functional Measures After Traumatic Brain Injury: Ceiling Effects of FIM, FIM+FAM, DRS, and CIQJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1996
- Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: Replication and extensionJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1995
- THE COMMUNITY INTEGRATION QUESTIONNAIRE A Comparative ExaminationAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1994
- Psychosocial recovery after head injuryArchives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 1993
- Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injuryJournal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1993
- The heterogeneity of social outcome following head injury.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1988
- The five year outcome of severe blunt head injury: a relative's view.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1986
- The short-term outcome of severe blunt head injury as reported by relatives of the injured persons.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1981
- Disability after severe head injury: observations on the use of the Glasgow Outcome Scale.Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 1981