Risks from self-referential peer review echo chambers developing in research fields
Author:
- Jeffrey UnermanJUJeffrey Unerman
- 1 September 2020
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by Elsevier in The British Accounting Review
- Vol. 52 (5)
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Corporate reporting and accounting for externalitiesAccounting and Business Research, 2018
- Confirmation bias: methodological causes and a palliative responseQuality & Quantity, 2016
- Incorporating Materiality Considerations into Analyses of Absence from Sustainability ReportingSocial and Environmental Accountability Journal, 2014
- Cargo cult science and the death of politics: A critical review of social and environmental accounting researchCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 2010
- Social accounting's emancipatory potential: A Gramscian critiqueCritical Perspectives on Accounting, 2009
- Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political BeliefsAmerican Journal of Political Science, 2006
- Investor Psychology and Asset PricingThe Journal of Finance, 2001
- Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many GuisesReview of General Psychology, 1998
- The Evolution of Editorial Peer ReviewJAMA, 1990
- The seeking of accounting where it is not: Towards a theory of non-accounting in organizational settingsAccounting, Organizations and Society, 1988