The transversal skills and competencies of health and social care professionals in community-based interprofessional teams: a rapid review
Open Access
- 20 May 2025
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Interprofessional Care
- Vol. 39 (5) , 857-870
Abstract
The increase in long-term conditions and healthcare costs in Europe requires a strategic approach, prioritizing the establishment of Community-Based Interprofessional Teams (CBIT). Health and social care professionals (HSCP) in community primary care and CBIT require specific transversal skills and competencies (S&C). This rapid review synthesized the essential transversal S&C across European countries and identified corresponding curricula learning objectives. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) was adopted to assess quality evidence. Identified S&C were clustered following the European Skills, Competences, Qualifications, and Occupations (ESCO) Framework, which clusters transversal S&C into six groups: Social and Communication, Self-Management, Thinking, Life, Core, and Physical & Manual S&C. Eight qualitative studies met our coherence eligibility criteria. Among ESCO clusters, Social and Communication S&C was emphasized as crucial, encompassing effective communication, team support, collaboration, leadership, and adherence to ethical codes. Self-management S&C highlighted efficient work and a learning-oriented mind-set, while Thinking S&C emphasized information processing, holistic thinking, and planning. Life S&C focused emphasized health-related applications, and Core S&C highlighted digital proficiency. No skills from the Physical and Manual S&C cluster were reported. To classify these S&C in learning objectives, Bloom's Taxonomy was adopted. Most learning objectives fell under "Procedural Knowledge," emphasizing understanding "How to do something." Future studies should explore the benefits of transversal S&C to enhance work in community primary care and CBIT practices.Keywords
Funding Information
- European Erasmus
This publication has 35 references indexed in Scilit:
- What are the best methods for rapid reviews of the research evidence? A systematic review of reviews and primary studiesResearch Synthesis Methods, 2023
- Development of a pilot interprofessional education workshop for healthcare students and assessment of interprofessional collaborative competency attainmentJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2023
- Specifics of and training needs in the inter-professional home care ofpeople with dementiaPflege, 2023
- A national survey to map IPE in IrelandJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2022
- Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group offers evidence-informed guidance to conduct rapid reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2021
- Working on working together. A systematic review on how healthcare professionals contribute to interprofessional collaborationJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2019
- The use of virtual communities of practice to improve interprofessional collaboration and education: findings from an integrated reviewJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2017
- Financing transformative health systems towards achievement of the health Sustainable Development Goals: a model for projected resource needs in 67 low-income and middle-income countriesThe Lancet Global Health, 2017
- Evaluating the effectiveness of health care teamsAustralian Health Review, 2005
- Teamwork in primary care: the views and experiences of nurses, midwives and health visitorsJournal of Advanced Nursing, 1994