Response to intravenous racemic ketamine after switch from intranasal (S)‐ketamine on symptoms of treatment‐resistant depression and post‐traumatic stress disorder in Veterans: A retrospective case series
Authors:
- 24 February 2022
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wiley in Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy
- Vol. 42 (3) , 272-279
Abstract
Background: Racemic (R,S)‐ketamine is a glutamatergic drug with potent and rapid acting antidepressant effects. An intranasal formulation of (S)‐ketamine was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to be used in individuals with treatment‐resistant depression (TRD). There are no data directly comparing outcomes on depression or other comorbidities between these two formulations of ketamine. However, recent meta‐analyses have suggested that IV racemic ketamine may be more potent than IN‐(S)‐ketamine.Methods: We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes in 15 Veterans with comorbid TRD and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) who underwent ketamine treatment at the VA San Diego Neuromodulation Clinic. All Veterans included in this analysis were given at least 6 intranasal (IN)‐(S)‐ketamine treatments prior to switching to treatment with IV racemic ketamine.Results: Veterans receiving ketamine treatment ( across both IN‐(S)‐ketamine and IV‐(R,S)‐ketamine) showed significant reductions in both the Patient Health Questionnaire‐9 (PHQ‐9), a self‐report scale measuring depression symptoms (rm ANOVA F(14,42) = 12.6, p < 0.0001), and in the PTSD checklist for DSM‐5 (PCL‐5), a self‐report scale measuring PSTD symptoms (rm ANOVA F(13,39) = 5.9, p = 0.006). Post hoc testing revealed that PHQ‐9 scores were reduced by an average of 2.4 ± 1.2 compared to baseline after (S)‐ketamine treatments (p = 0.1) and by an average of 5.6 ± 1 after IV‐ketamine treatments (p = 0.0003) compared to pretreatment baseline scores. PCL‐5 scores were reduced by an average of 4.3 ± 3.3 after IN (S)‐ketamine treatments (p = 0.6) and 11.8 ± 3.5 after IV‐ketamine treatments (p = 0.03) compared to pretreatment baseline scores.Conclusions: This work suggests that off‐label IV‐(R,S)‐ketamine could be considered a reasonable next step in patients who do not respond adequately to the FDA‐approved IN‐(S)‐ketamine. Further double‐blinded, randomized controlled trials are warranted to assess whether IV racemic ketamine is more effective than IN‐(S)‐ketamine.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute of Mental Health (K23)
- Burroughs Wellcome Fund (Career Award for Medical Scientists (CAMS))
- Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health
This publication has 31 references indexed in Scilit:
- NMDAR inhibition-independent antidepressant actions of ketamine metabolitesNature, 2016
- Mechanisms underlying differential effectiveness of memantine and ketamine in rapid antidepressant responsesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2014
- Antidepressant Efficacy of Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Major Depression: A Two-Site Randomized Controlled TrialAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2013
- NMDA receptor blockade at rest triggers rapid behavioural antidepressant responsesNature, 2011
- A Randomized Trial of an N-methyl-D-aspartate Antagonist in Treatment-Resistant Major DepressionArchives of General Psychiatry, 2006
- A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Memantine in the Treatment of Major DepressionAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 2006
- Plasma concentration profiles of ketamine and norketamine after administration of various ketamine preparations to healthy Japanese volunteersBiopharmaceutics & Drug Disposition, 2002
- The Stereoselective Effects of Ketamine Isomers on Heteromeric N-Methyl-d-Aspartate Receptor ChannelsAnesthesia & Analgesia, 2000
- Stereoselective Interaction of Ketamine with Recombinant [micro sign], [small kappa, Greek], and [small delta, Greek] Opioid Receptors Expressed in Chinese Hamster Ovary CellsAnesthesiology, 1999
- Differential effects of ketamine enantiomers on NMDA receptor currents in cultured neuronsEuropean Journal of Pharmacology, 1992