Solute removal during continuous renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: convection versus diffusion
Open Access
- 28 April 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Critical Care
- Vol. 10 (2) , R67
Abstract
Introduction: The best modality, for continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is currently uncertain and it is poorly understood how transport of different solutes, whether convective or diffusive, changes over time. Methods: We conducted a prospective cross over study in a cohort of critically ill patients, comparing small (urea and creatinine) and middle (β2 microglobulin) molecular weight solute clearance, filter lifespan and membrane performance over a period of 72 hours, during 15 continuous veno-venous dialysis (CVVHD) and 15 continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH)sessions. Both modalities were administered based on a prescription of 35 ml/kg/h and using polyacrylonitrile filters. Results: Median filter lifespan was significantly longer during CVVHD (37 hours, interquartile range (IQR) 19.5 to 72.5) than CVVH (19 hours, IQR 12.5 to 28) (p = 0.03). Median urea time weighted average (TWA) clearances were not significantly different during CVVH (31.6 ml/minute, IQR 23.2 to 38.9) and CVVHD (35.7 ml/minute, IQR 30.1 to 41.5) (p = 0.213). Similar results were found for creatinine: 38.1 ml/minute, IQR 28.5 to 39, and 35.6 ml/minute, IQR 26 to 43 (p = 0.917), respectively. Median β2m TWA clearance was higher during convective (16.3 ml/minute, IQR 10.9 to 23) than diffusive (6.27 ml/minute, IQR 1.6 to 14.9) therapy; nonetheless this difference did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055). Median TWA adsorptive clearance of β2m appeared to have scarce impact on overall solute removal (0.012 ml/minute, IQR -0.09 to 0.1, during hemofiltration versus -0.016 ml/minute, IQR -0.08 to 0.1 during dialysis; p = 0.79). Analysis of clearance modification over time did not show significant modifications of urea, creatinine and β2m clearance in the first 48 hours during both treatments. In the CVVHD group, the only significant difference was found for β2m between 72 hours and baseline clearance. Conclusion: Polyacrylonitrile filters during continuous hemofiltration and continuous hemodialysis delivered at 35 ml/kg/h are comparable in little and middle size solute removal. CVVHD appears to warrant longer CRRT sessions. The capacity of both modalities for removing such molecules is maintained up to 48 hours.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Regional citrate versus systemic heparin anticoagulation for continuous renal replacement in critically ill patientsKidney International, 2005
- Renal Replacement II: Dialysis DoseCritical Care Clinics, 2005
- Adjunctive therapies in sepsis: An evidence-based reviewCritical Care Medicine, 2004
- Membranes for hemodialysis2004
- Solute mass balance during isovolaemic high volume haemofiltrationIntensive Care Medicine, 2003
- Dosing patterns for continuous renal replacement therapy at a large academic medical center in the United StatesJournal of Critical Care, 2002
- Effects of early high-volume continuous venovenous hemofiltration on survival and recovery of renal function in intensive care patients with acute renal failure: A prospective, randomized trialCritical Care Medicine, 2002
- Effects of different doses in continuous veno-venous haemofiltration on outcomes of acute renal failure: a prospective randomised trialThe Lancet, 2000
- Comparison of mortality in ESRD patients on convective and diffusive extracorporeal treatmentsKidney International, 1999
- Diffusive vs. convective therapyCritical Care Medicine, 1998