Exploring the Difference Between Male and Female Intimate Partner Homicides
Authors:
- 1 November 2006
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Homicide Studies
- Vol. 10 (4) , 279-292
Abstract
This research examines the role of situational factors in differentiating between male- and female-perpetrated intimate partner homicide. Applying concepts from Luckenbill’s theory of homicide as a situated transaction, an intimate partner homicide is seen as an amorphous event where the role of offender and victim emerge during the transaction. When adopting this framework, it is possible to treat the sex of the offender as a dependent variable and examine situational factors that may differentiate between male and female intimate partner homicide offenders. The data used in this analysis come from the lethal sample of the Chicago Women’s Health Risk Study, 1995 to 1998. These data consist of records for 85 heterosexual intimate homicide incidents that occurred in Chicago in 1995 and 1996. Logistic regression analyses indicate that the presence of a prehomicide injury and whether the offender used a knife differentiate between male and female offenders. Implications for future research are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Femicide in New York CityHomicide Studies, 2005
- Twenty Years of Rural and Urban Trends in Family and Intimate Partner HomicideHomicide Studies, 2005
- Couple Age Discrepancy and Risk of Intimate Partner HomicideViolence and Victims, 2004
- Exposure Reduction or Retaliation? The Effects of Domestic Violence Resources on Intimate-Partner HomicideLaw & Society Review, 2003
- Explaining the Decline in Intimate Partner HomicideHomicide Studies, 1999
- DISENTANGLING THE EFFECTS OF GENDER AND INTIMACY ON VICTIM PRECIPITATION IN HOMICIDE*Criminology, 1998
- Homicide-Suicide in Older PersonsAmerican Journal of Psychiatry, 1998
- Intimate Partner Homicide in Chicago Over 29 YearsCrime & Delinquency, 1995
- An Introduction to the Bootstrap1993
- A power primer.Psychological Bulletin, 1992