Challenges for Evidence-Based Physical Therapy: Accessing and Interpreting High-Quality Evidence on Therapy
Open Access
- 1 July 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Physical Therapy
- Vol. 84 (7) , 644-654
Abstract
Although there is a growing awareness of evidence-based practice among physical therapists, implementation of evidence-based practice has proved difficult. This article discusses barriers to access and interpretation of evidence. Some solutions are offered, including facilitating the publication of all research, use of an optimum format for reporting research, maximizing the efficient use of electronic databases, improving physical therapists' skills in critical appraisal of published research, and fostering consumer access to evidence. These strategies and others discussed in the article might facilitate implementation of evidence-based physical therapy.Keywords
This publication has 44 references indexed in Scilit:
- Journal provision and the prevalence of journal clubs: a survey of physiotherapy departments in England and AustraliaPhysiotherapy Research International, 2001
- Barriers to Implementing the Evidence Base in Four NHS TherapiesPhysiotherapy, 2001
- Barriers and bridges to evidence based clinical practiceBMJ, 1998
- Publication bias: evidence of delayed publication in a cohort study of clinical research projectsBMJ, 1997
- Physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: Bases for Australian physiotherapists’ choice of treatmentPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice, 1994
- Factors Influencing Publication of Research ResultsJAMA, 1992
- Physical Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation: Bases for Swedish Physiotherapists' Choice of TreatmentPhysiotherapy Theory and Practice, 1992
- Publication bias in clinical researchThe Lancet, 1991
- Publication Bias: A Problem in Interpreting Medical DataJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1988
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979