A Robust-Reliable Decision-Making Methodology Based on a Combination of Stakeholders’ Preferences Simulation and KDD Techniques for Selecting Automotive Platform Benchmark
Open Access
Abstract
The automotive family design is known as one of the most complex engineering design problems with multiple groups of stakeholders involved from different domains of interest and contradictory attributes. Taking into account all stakeholders’ preferences, which are generally symmetrical, non-deterministic distributions around a mean value, and determining the right value of attributes for each alternative are two basic challenges for these types of decision-making problems. In this research, the possibility to achieve a robust-reliable decision by focusing on the two aforementioned challenges is explored. In the proposed methodology, a random simulation technique is used to elicit stakeholders’ preferences and determine the relative importance of attributes. The decision space and values of attributes are determined using the Knowledge Discovery in Databases (KDD) technique, and to achieve a robust-reliable decision, statistical and sensitivity analyses are performed. By implementing this methodology, the decision-maker is assured that the preferences of all stakeholders are taken into account and the determined values for attributes are reliable with the least degree of uncertainty. The proposed methodology aims to select benchmark platforms for the development of an automotive family. The decision space includes 546 automobiles in 11 different segments based on 34 platforms. There are 6223 unique possible states of stakeholders’ preferences. As a result, five platforms with the highest degree of desirability and robustness to diversity and uncertainty in the stakeholders’ preferences are selected. The presented methodology can be implemented in complex decision-making problems, including a large and diverse number of stakeholders and multiple attributes. In addition, this methodology is compatible with many Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) techniques, including SAW, AHP, SWARA, and TOPSIS.Keywords
Funding Information
- The Slovak Scientific Grand Agency VEGA (2/0135/23, 18/CRT/6223)
- Science Foundation Ireland Centre for Research Training in Artificial Intelligence (2/0135/23, 18/CRT/6223)
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Study of Multicriteria Decision Making for Supplier Selection in Automotive IndustryJournal of Industrial Engineering, 2013
- A human-centred design approach for developing dynamic decision support system based on knowledge discovery in databasesJournal of Decision Systems, 2013
- A hybrid MCDM approach for evaluating an automobile purchase modelInternational Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 2013
- The Comparative Analysis of MCDA Methods SAW and COPRASEngineering Economics, 2011
- Multi-criteria decision-making for automobile purchase using an integrated analytical quality fuzzy (AQF) techniqueInternational Journal of Services and Operations Management, 2011
- An integrated group decision making model and its evaluation by DEA for automobile industryExpert Systems with Applications, 2010
- A stochastic method for robustness analysis in sorting problemsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2009
- Sensitivity analysis of a simple additive weight methodInternational Journal of Management and Decision Making, 2007
- Monte Carlo simulation techniques for group decision making with incomplete informationEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 2006
- Simulation techniques for the sensitivity analysis of multi-criteria decision modelsEuropean Journal of Operational Research, 1997