An international urogynecological association (IUGA)/international continence society (ICS) joint terminology and classification of the complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses (meshes, implants, tapes) and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery
Top Cited Papers
- 22 December 2010
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in Neurourology and Urodynamics
- Vol. 30 (1) , 2-12
Abstract
Introduction and hypothesis: A terminology and standardized classification has yet to be developed for those complications arising directly from the insertion of synthetic (prostheses) and biological (grafts) materials in female pelvic floor surgery.Methods: This report on the above terminology and classification combines the input of members of the Standardization and Terminology Committees of two International Organizations, the International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) and the International Continence Society (ICS) and a Joint IUGA/ICS Working Group on Complications Terminology, assisted at intervals by many expert external referees. An extensive process of 11 rounds of internal and external review took place with exhaustive examination of each aspect of the terminology and classification. Decision‐making was by collective opinion (consensus).Results: A terminology and classification of complications related directly to the insertion of prostheses and grafts in female pelvic floor surgery has been developed, with the classification based on category (C), time (T) and site (S) classes and divisions, that should encompass all conceivable scenarios for describing insertion complications and healing abnormalities. The CTS code for each complication, involving three (or four) letters and three numerals, is likely to be very suitable for any surgical audit or registry, particularly one that is procedure‐specific. Users of the classification have been assisted by case examples, colour charts and online aids (www.icsoffice.org/complication).Conclusion: A consensus‐based terminology and classification report for prosthesis and grafts complications in female pelvic floor surgery has been produced, aimed at being a significant aid to clinical practice and research. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:2–12, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐LissKeywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Introduction to the 2005 IUGA Grafts RoundtableInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2006
- The biology behind fascial defects and the use of implants in pelvic organ prolapse repairInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2006
- Evolution of biological and synthetic grafts in reconstructive pelvic surgeryInternational Urogynecology Journal, 2006
- Transobturator Tape (Uratape®): A New Minimally-Invasive Procedure to Treat Female Urinary IncontinenceEuropean Urology, 2004
- How to Construct a Mesh? Impact of Structure, Filament and Pore Size for Tissue Ingrowth2004
- A three‐year follow up of tension free vaginal tape for surgical treatment of female stress urinary incontinenceBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 1999
- Classification of biomaterials and their related complications in abdominal wall hernia surgeryHernia, 1997
- Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinenceObstetrics & Gynecology, 1997
- Role of the Artificial Urinary Sphincter in the Treatment of Stress Incontinence in WomenBritish Journal of Urology, 1992
- Transplantation of fascia for relief of urinary stress incontinenceAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1942