From collaborative research to new product development: why a central or brokered network position is not enough
Authors:
- 14 July 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Emerald Publishing in Journal of Knowledge Management
- Vol. 26 (3) , 615-641
Abstract
Purpose: Although collaborative research is believed to be an important means of accessing external knowledge, research on whether taking a strategic network position benefits new product development (NPD) is inconclusive. This study aims to unravel the conditions under which taking a strategic position within a collaborative research network is conducive for a firm’s NPD.Design/methodology/approach: Drawing on social network theory, absorptive capacity theory and knowledge recombinant studies, this study examines how strategic network positions (i.e. degree centrality and structural holes) and knowledge base cohesion (i.e. local and global cohesion) in tandem affect a firm’s NPD. A panel data set of 366 firms in the Chinese automobile sector (2002–2010) is empirically analyzed, using the panel negative binomial approach with random effects and several alternate estimation approaches.Findings: This study reveals that, rather than the volume of a firm’s knowledge base, its cohesion determines how it absorbs and uses knowledge accrued from collaborative research for NPD. Specifically, this paper finds that centrally positioned firms have greater NPD when their knowledge bases are locally cohesive, while firms spanning structural holes have more NPD when their knowledge bases are globally cohesive.Originality/value: Successfully transferring collaborative research outcomes into product innovation is difficult. This study contributes to the literature on strategic network positions and NPD. The findings advance the understanding of knowledge base cohesion’s moderating role in explaining how firms absorb and exploit external knowledge for internal innovation. The findings also have important implications for managers who wish to promote product innovation by engaging in collaborative research with external partners.Keywords
This publication has 105 references indexed in Scilit:
- Properties of knowledge base and firm survival: Evidence from a sample of French manufacturing firmsTechnological Forecasting and Social Change, 2013
- Institutional Polycentrism, Entrepreneurs' Social Networks, and New Venture GrowthAcademy of Management Journal, 2013
- Knowledge Specialization, Knowledge Brokerage and the Uneven Growth of Technology DomainsSocial Forces, 2009
- Can you have your Cake and Eat it too? Structural Holes' Influence on Status Accumulation and Market Performance in Collaborative NetworksAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2008
- The use of logit and probit models in strategic management research: Critical issuesStrategic Management Journal, 2007
- Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and ExtensionAcademy of Management Review, 2002
- Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal StudyAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2000
- Aging, Obsolescence, and Organizational InnovationAdministrative Science Quarterly, 2000
- Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested HypothesesEconometrica, 1989
- Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear modelsBiometrika, 1986